Slant Magazine
Advertisement
Advertise With Us

New Releases

 more   


Poll

Belle Toujours
Email  Bookmark Print
Director(s): Manoel de Oliveira. Screenplay: Manoel de Oliveira. Cast: Michel Piccoli, Bulle Ogier, Ricardo Trepa, Leonor Baldaque and Júlia Buisel. Distributor: New Yorker Films. Runtime: 68 min. Rating: NR. Year: 2006.

Belle Toujours

anoel de Oliveira is someone Luis Buńuel actively rebelled against: an aesthete. Belle Toujours, a sequel of sorts to Belle de Jour, plays out as a bad bar joke. Literally. What do you get when a man walks into a bar and deconstructs a Buńuel picture for half an hour? The answer is not a whole lot. The genius of Buńuel's 39-year-old masterpiece—like that of David Lynch's modern renovation, Mulholland Drive—is how the walls separating its conscious and unconscious dimensions are completely dissolved. De Oliveira strips the original film of its power by cementing its spongy mysteries with banal annotation. Michel Piccoli, one of the brightest stars in Buńuel's complex milky way of philosophical wonders, reprises the role of Henri Husson, who spots Séverine Serizy (Bulle Ogier) at a symphony (Lynch's Bondar might say, "Si hay banda!"), loses her in a crowd, and spends much of the film trying to catch her—perhaps to taunt her with broken glass and play with her as he once did under a table. By casting Ogier, one of the middle-class dopes from The Discreet Charm of the Bourgeoisie, in the role originated by Catherine Deneuve, and keeping her character out of Husson's hair for so long, de Olivera rekindles a familiar Buńuelian theme: woman as obscure object of desire. But Husson, after deconstructing Belle de Jour and Buńuel's directorial mantra for a barkeep, will eventually catch her, at which point Séverine reveals, during a suspenseful candlelit dinner, that the past is long gone and her sexuality is no longer "unbalanced." Buńuel, the most acerbic humanist the movies have ever seen, would have been disappointed to see Belle de Jour stripped of its stunning ambiguities and Séverine judging herself so: By assuming that the 1967 film's supposed perversities in fact took place in the real world, de Oliviera doesn't have to pose moral arguments in relation to what Raymond Durgnat described as the "inner world of desires and feelings" of its characters. Not that de Oliviera's film should behave like Buńuel's, but why does growing old have to mean becoming boring?

Feature: The 44th New York Film Festival


Advertisement


Advertisement
Advertisement

Staff    Slant on Facebook    Slant on Twitter    Contact    Media Kit    Privacy Policy    Terms of Service    RSS

Copyright © 2001 - 2009 Slant Magazine