The House Next Door

Archive: April, 2008

Tribeca Film Festival 2008: Savage Grace

Tribeca Film Festival 2008: Savage Grace

Savage Grace, Tom Kalin's first feature since 1992's Swoon, is a dull pastiche about the life and murder of socialite Barbara Daly Baekeland. "A master of the understated" is how Tony (Eddie Redmayne) describes his mummy in the film's opening voiceover, and her cunning is demonstrated at a dinner party during which the barriers of language and rules of etiquette collide: After a man presumes Barbara (Julianne Moore) doesn't understand French and makes a crude remark about her rump, the woman tries to get a younger Tony (Barney Clark) to read from a George Bataille-approved copy of the Marquise de Sade's Justine. The scene is dizzying, even if it's unclear if Barbara is reacting against the rules of bourgeois engagement or to the Frenchman's affront, but Kalin presumes his aesthetic mode is as provocative as Barbara's wild couture: He wants to provoke but his angles are often confusing, as in a scene where Barbara's husband Brooks (Stephen Dillane) fucks her in the ass and it's uncertain if she's looking into a mirror or down a hallway. From New York in 1946 to London in 1972, the story jostles from one jet-setting locale to the next at an ugly pace, all set to a meaninglessly smoky soundtrack, picking up and losing characters without fanfare until Barbara and Tony's incest is flung at audiences like some putrid animal skin. If the much-ballyhooed scene is hardly disturbing it's because Kalin is more committed to pushing trite metaphor (a dead dog's collar becomes a symbol for the lack of constancy in these people's lives) than he is to sketching credible character motivation (history tells us that Barbara wanted to cure Tony's homosexuality, but her agenda feels vague here). Rather than imitate the postmodernism chic of Far from Heaven or the parodic silliness of Die, Mommie, Die!, Kalin settles for a nondescript style whose sole function is to stay out of Moore's way. Just as Die, Mommie, Die! is Charles Busch's stomping ground, the similarly one-note Savage Grace is only special for Moore's delicious performance, though this great actress does not settle for facile vamping, conveying a chilling combativeness and tragic sense of emotional resignation with nearly every gesture, whether she is exhaling a sinister plume of cigarette smoke or chomping on an olive, bringing glints of life to Kalin's comatose artistry.




Tags: ,

No Comments »

"Some Other Time"

Jennifer Dawson




Tags:

No Comments »

913 (54). O Lucky Man! (1973, Lindsay Anderson)

[Editor's Note: This is the latest entry in House contributor Kevin B. Lee's Shooting Down Pictures, a record of his ongoing quest to see every title on the list of the 1000 Greatest Films compiled by They Shoot Pictures, Don't They?]

_____________________

Lindsay Anderson and Malcolm McDowell's follow-up to the infamous If... (TSPDT #567) stars McDowell as a fresh-faced young Candidean stumbling through a picaresque that sprawlingly catalogs the abuses and absurdities of all corners of 70s British society: provincial philistines staging miscegenation sex shows; scientists grafting pig parts to human guinea pigs; and a military industrial alliance enabling genocide overseas. Indeed, the only institution that seems to be depicted favorably is the prison where McDowell is indoctrinated into Marxist utopianism, only to be mauled upon his release by the homeless people he seeks to serve. Heavy on incident and yet somehow vague in insight, David Sherwin's screenplay seems to depend heavily on the audience taking its wry depictions of widespread dystopia at face value to attain an aura of verity. For his part Anderson maintains a snarkily buoyant tone to the proceedings, aided by Alan Price's running commentary song score and various metacinematic gestures to keep things teasingly playful, such as casting actors in multiple roles and having Price and his band appear midway. The finale involves a casting session with McDowell's character for the very film in which he just starred, climaxing into a New Agey epiphany followed by a dance-a-long precursor to the ending of David Lynch's Inland Empire. The performances by the multi-tasking ensemble are uniformly convincing in conveying a societal landscape of alluring menace; watching them it's easy to be caught up in the skill by which they inhabit and skewer their roles, though the lingering feeling of cynicism following the proceedings may wear differently on a given viewer.

_____________________________________
To read the rest of the article at Shooting Down Pictures, click here.




Tags:

2 Comments »

Links for the Day (April 27th, 2008)

1. "Search for shark on; beaches closed": Hooper!!!

["A few paddleboarders ignored posted signs warning that a great white shark still could be lurking below the surface Saturday, just a day after a swimmer was killed in a rare attack near San Diego. "It's like going to see 'Jaws'—getting in the water the next day, all you could think about was the music," said Bob Rief, 63, who was teaching a friend how to stand up on a paddleboard. "But if you're afraid of the ocean, you shouldn't be in it." The San Diego-area native was worried that the attack would scare away vacationers or weekend beachgoers and hurt businesses. Solana Beach is 14 miles northwest of San Diego."] Continue Reading »




Tags:

5 Comments »

Tribeca Film Festival 2008: Profit motive and the whispering wind and Hidden in Plain Sight

Tribeca Film Festival 2008: Profit motive and the whispering wind

A lone headstone laid in a field, weeds nearly obscuring the inscribed words "Gone but Not Forgotten," is perhaps the key thematic scene in John Gianvito's hour-long video elegy Profit motive and the whispering wind. Simple graves, imposing tombs, historical markers, and commemorative signs dedicated to the memory of American progressive or radical heroes and martyrs are observed in long shot, then sometimes in leisurely close-up to absorb the epitaph or marker's text in full. (Occasionally Gianvito will zero in to note decay, in the illegibility of aged words on marble, or the worms crawling on William Lloyd Garrison's crypt.) Always recorded in what appears to be high spring or summer, the succession of memorials is reverent but never somnambulant; the winds don't only whisper, but occasionally roar violently through the lush grasses and tree-limb canopies. The conspicuous sound design is also loaded with hissing sprinklers, whirring mowers, and noisy ambient traffic; several totems honoring massacred Native Americans or miners stand on highway shoulders or at rest stops. Have these suffragettes, union workers, educators, and activists been given special places in the memory and the landscape, or are they neglectfully lost in cemeteries, state-sanctioned statuary, and dutiful, academic lip service?

Beneath the meditative procession of sites, Gianvito layers an anxiety built into most viewers' gaps in 17th-to-20th-century U.S. history; for every Mother Jones, Cesar Chavez, Malcolm X, and Thoreau, there are several names likely to puzzle all but the best-read buffs, at least until you can check Google (or Howard Zinn's A People's History of the United States, from which Profit was inspired). Bursts of animation—washing hands, arguing and bellicose men—and the cumulative sense of endurance of the longstanding monuments and their honorees keep the act of posthumous witness vibrant, not ossified or ritualistic. Unfortunately, Gianvito concludes with an overreaching link to contemporary activism, introduced by foliage-obscured shots of facades of Shell, Wal-Mart, and McDonalds. (There's no legacy, or transcendent epiphanies, in the failures of anti-Bush activism of recent years.) An unfortunate reminder of Gianvito's hamfisted polemical fiction feature The Mad Songs of Fernanda Hussein, it's a concluding misstep. Profit otherwise keenly connects these giants of America's past to the living more quietly, in the presence of labor and feminist buttons next to flowers on gravesites, or the plea etched on a female organizer's tomb: DON'T IRON WHILE THE STRIKE IS HOT!

Far less successful at going in one era and out the other is Hidden in Plain Sight, a quasi-diaristic attempt by New Yorker Mark Street to glean commonalities of life and distant history in his travels to Santiago, Dakar, Hanoi, and Marseille. Like a tourist with an anthropologic bent and a better-than-average eye for capturing sidewalk food vendors, laborers, armies of cyclists, and retail curiosities like a clock crowned with an illuminated image of Ho Chi Minh, Street takes his cue from André Breton's dictum "The city is the only field of experience"—but his is a general gaze with negligible direction because his intuition doesn't lead him much of anywhere. Early scenes in the Chilean capital of the presidential palace, while Salvador Allende's final telephoned words during the 1973 coup are heard, don't shake off their archival identity, and a later visit to hilly Valparaiso (birthplace of Allende and his vanquisher Pinochet) doesn't prompt anything but a digression about earthquakes and the videographer's pleasure at witnessing urban "rupture." Superficial anecdotes of Ho Chi Minh's life in three of the cities are a similar dead end. Titling sections of Hidden "Wandering," "Learning to Look," "Torn Apart Again," and "Synthesis," Street's allegedly scientific model yields little data except, presumably, to him, who finds he sees home with new clarity after his travels. His expanded vision remains mysterious, beyond the sight of bikers toting banh mi in both Hanoi and the Lower East Side.




Tags: , ,

No Comments »

Bloodless: Harold & Kumar Escape From Guantanamo Bay

By Steven Boone

Somebody needed to do a merciless sendup of Homeland Security bullshit, but are Harold and Kumar up to the task? Not quite. The indelible characters from Harold & Kumar Go to White Castle are not political creatures. They tweak and diffuse class and racial tensions by rendering them silly and inconsequential. Like Team America creators Trey Parker and Matthew Stone, Harold & Kumar Escape From Guantanamo Bay writer-directors Jon Hurwitz and Hayden Schlossberg seem to believe that America's problems are just a matter of a few uptight douchebags spoiling the party for the rest of us level-headed dudes. (If Al Qaeda and the Pentagon would just chillax...) This is satire for unapologetic stoners and frat nerds who engage politics only when something of a political nature butts in and cock-blocks. Missing from this and most other post-9/11 lampoons are the element that would give them real electricity and bigger, longer laughs: the rude fact of power and powerlessness. Great satire requires a dash of blood. Continue Reading »




Tags:

4 Comments »

BSG Saturdays: Season 4, Ep. 4, "Escape Velocity"

By Todd VanDerWerff

"Escape Velocity" is probably one of those episodes that most of the diehard Battlestar fans will hate because it's a little strange, the feel of it is rather hazy and, well, not a lot actually HAPPENS in it. It's very definitely one of those episodes that exists solely to set up future episodes and to create plot points and/or red herrings that will keep those following the storyline guessing as the series plays out. The episode also focuses on the weird mysticism that has always permeated the series, and it deals with the painful birthing pangs of monotheism. In some ways, it feels like more of a thinkpiece than an episode of a very plot-driven series. I really liked it, all things considered, but if you hated it, I don't blame you. It kind of drifts about like a fever dream or a vision rather than just getting to the point already, though it builds to a memorable montage, filled with portent. And now that I troll the TWOP boards to read fan reactions, I see that most everyone else was on its wavelength too, so, once again, my fandom radar is way off. Continue Reading »




Tags: , ,

14 Comments »

Doctor Who, Season Four, Ep. 1: "Partners in Crime"

By Ross Ruediger

After more or less trashing "Voyage of the Damned" last week, it'd be all too easy to start a trend by picking apart Season Four's first proper episode, "Partners in Crime." The series has followed a predictable pattern with its season openers. They're romps that acquaint (or reacquaint) the lead characters. The antagonist threat seems mild in comparison to typical Doctor dilemmas. There's always an emphasis on humor, some mild social commentary, loads of running around and an easily resolved finale. "Partners in Crime" does adhere to the formula, but last week I stated "...Who should, at the very least, recycle the old into something vaguely new." Where "Partners" succeeds is in its mild tweaking of the norm. If the season continues playing with established formula (which I'll try to address in the coming weeks), then it could end up the best batch of episodes yet. Continue Reading »




Tags: , ,

9 Comments »

Links for the Day (April 26th, 2008)

1. Some reports from Ebertfest '08, courtesy Jim Emerson at Scanners: "Springing forward" (the introductory post); "Shoot the paparazzo" (in which Tom DiCillo talks about his film, Delirious); and ""Great"-ness" (in which Emerson recalls his love for Bill Forsyth's Housekeeping). More from Kim Voynar at Cinematical.

["All of Bill Forsyth's films ("That Sinking Feeling," "Gregory's Girl," "Local Hero," "Comfort and Joy") have been about eccentrics, who are viewed with an enchantingly Gaelic brand of bemused and generous forbearance. "Housekeeping," his first US film, takes a darker, more complex view of idiosyncratic behavior, and is all the richer for it; it's the first Great American Film directed by a Scotsman. To the loopy highlanders in Forsyth's other movies, eccentricity is a way of life, something to be accepted naturally, as part of the landscape."] Continue Reading »




Tags:

2 Comments »

Tribeca Film Festival 2008: Baghead

Tribeca Film Festival 2008: Baghead

A prankish comedy-thriller overtly about desperation and insecurity, Baghead begins with a dead-on Q&A at a Los Angeles indie film festival, where an underground auteur (Jett Garner) condescendingly responds on matters of budget and improvisation. ("Do you plan every word you're going to say every day?") A quartet of unemployed actors, after being ejected from the fest's afterparty, ruminate about their careers and decide to hole up in a house in the sticks to write a screenplay for their own calling-card vehicle. This second feature by the Duplass brothers, with co-writer/lead actor Jay from The Puffy Chair now sharing directing credit with Mark, soon becomes a kind of mumblecorish spin on The Blair Witch Project (or a riff on that movie's founding marketing myth that it was authentic found footage). But the crux of the suspense is where the joking will stop, both among the deceptive and game-playing characters and by the filmmakers. As a hybrid, it's destined to disappoint horror fiends who take its predator-in-the-woods moves at face value, but it delivers on its premise that the shameless scheming of a friend can be a scarier phenomenon than a boogeyman with a knife.

The rural retreat is fraught with emotional evasions and sexual peril, as would-be leader Matt (Ross Partridge) has enjoyed 11-year on-off "soulmate" status with soft-shelled beauty Catherine (Elise Muller), who harbors thirtysomething worries about maintaining a screen-friendly ass while noting Matt's flirtation with the younger, pixieish Michelle (Greta Gerwig). Matt's self-loathing, pudgy pal Chad (Steve Zissis) is smitten with Michelle, who ducks her head away from his attempted kiss while stingingly reassuring him he's her best friend and like family. Before things can devolve into full-blown sex farce, Michelle has a dream (or does she?) of a menacing figure with a bag over his head lurking outside the cabin, and Matt seizes on it as a perfect concept for their script. Then a bedroom-invading baghead materializes, and there are a couple of disappearances; is it the work of a psycho or just, as the press notes jokily call it, "a Scooby-Doo narrative"?

For all the use of first takes and jerky camera moves, the John Cassavetes invoked by Baghead is not the indie pioneer saint but his Faustian thespian-husband character in Rosemary's Baby. Isolated cabin setting notwithstanding, the principals aren't horny teenagers but varying types of neurotics who are just old enough to be panicking at their lack of prospects. (Among the nice Friday the 13th-variety in-jokes, however, is an unpleasant shock that comes to Matt mid-masturbation.) All four of the ensemble members impress as recognizable, self-designated losers who are alternately buoyed and annoyed by the others' attentions and demands. "I am cute, I am funny," Matt makes Chad repeat to deflect the focus from their tiff over Michelle, but also trying to be his friend's Broadway Danny Rose in a strangely supportive way, with stranger yet to come. If the film's "reveal" can't help coming off as anticlimactic, the novelty of its creators' juxtapositions and energy of its cast make it a funny and disquieting stumble through sleepaway-camp territory, and a caution not to mix unrequited love with screenwriting.




Tags: ,

No Comments »

Tribeca Film Festival 2008: Redbelt

Tribeca Film Festival 2008: Redbelt

David Mamet may not be the visual stylist that Jean-Pierre Melville was, but in most other respects, his Redbelt is faithfully cast in the tradition of the great French auteur's Le Samouraï. As in Melville's brooding gangster classic, Mamet's film focuses on a lonely, figurative samurai devoted to a governing code, in this case a jiu-jitsu instructor named Mike Terry (Chiwetel Ejiofor) who runs a Los Angeles martial arts academy where he trains both lay people and cops. Already low on cash, much to his clothing designer wife's (Alice Braga) chagrin, Mike becomes ensnared in grave personal and financial circumstances after an accidental shooting at the academy and a bar fight involving a movie star (Tim Allen). The gears of fate soon begin turning, and Mamet takes thoughtful time laying out the forces that will, in due course, thrust Mike into the professional mixed-martial arts fighting arena which he shuns because, as the teachings of his red-belted master counsel, "A competition is not a fight."

As shot by Robert Elswit, Redbelt is clean and compact, its cinematography and editing exhibiting a clipped vigorousness that thankfully isn't complemented by the writer-director's usual, rat-a-tat-tat staccato verbal sparring, which makes only very occasional appearances. Brutal briskness characterizes the sporadic hand-to-hand combat sequences, though the story's prime concern is violence against not the body but the soul, as Mike's struggle isn't really against any particular opponent but a life and world in which wealth, status, and comfort are valued more than honesty, honor, and loyalty. It's a moral conflict expertly conveyed by Ejiofor, who, whether delivering stern lessons to his police officer student and friend Joe (Max Martini) or dealing with a host of shady businessmen (including Mamet regulars Rickey Jay and Joe Mantegna), smartly expresses his character's staunch conviction with hints of sorrow born from the recognition that devotion to his "code of the warrior" and its rituals inevitably means pain for himself and those he cares about.

This being a Mamet work, a central con naturally figures into the proceedings, and despite the capable orchestration of that subterfuge, the knowledge that a climactic revelation lies in wait diffuses at least a measure of suspense. Yet unlike so many of the director's previous cinematic puzzle games, Redbelt cares far less about tricking its audience than about plumbing its protagonist's psyche in a way both viscerally exciting and intensely analytical, a nifty trick that's aided by a host of uniformly sturdy but tonally divergent supporting actors (dainty Emily Mortimer, chilly Rebecca Pidgeon, hammy Rodrigo Santoro, goofy Tim Allen) who don't, at first glance, seem well-suited to coexist with each other. Yet that, ultimately, is the real trick Mamet pulls off: finding a way to make his latest's disparate elements—its formulaic sports industry critique, its narrative twists, its mismatched performances, and its sometimes overt, sometimes understated articulations of theme—perfectly coalesce into a precise, invigorating portrait of the difficulty and nobility of remaining true to oneself.




Tags: ,

No Comments »

Links for the Day (April 25th, 2008)

1. "When Government branding goes wrong...": What happens when you flip the above logo? Click the link to find out. (Hattip Ali Arikan)

["The UK Office of Government Commerce is: Responsible for improving value for money by driving up standards and capability in procurement. Now, let's see, how would you improve value for money? I know! An expensive branding exercise. That'll do it. So FHD, the prestigious London branding agency, has been brought in to devise, among other things, a new logo. And here, courtesy of The Register, it is... A spokesman for the OGC said (I kid you not) this: We concluded that the effect was generic to the particular combination of the letters 'OGC' - and is not inappropriate to an organisation that's looking to have a firm grip on government spend."] Continue Reading »




Tags:

4 Comments »

Tribeca Film Festival 2008: My Winnipeg

Tribeca Film Festival 2008: My Winnipeg

What is home, and if we want to leave but can't, why not? So asks Guy Maddin in a "docu-fantasia" about his native and lifelong city, My Winnipeg, his third consecutive feature with a protagonist named Guy Maddin (Darcy Fehr), here glimpsed throughout as one of several dozing, twitching night-train passengers headed out of the snowy, bone-freezing capital of Manitoba. But the dominant Maddin is the narrating filmmaker, more palpably present than usual in the sound of his voice, bemoaning a lost golden age of his hometown—"the heart of the heart of the continent"—and as usual excavating his memories, family history, and sense of self through the visual tropes of '20s and '30s cinema, and the straight-faced absurdities of the tall tale. Unlike some of his recent movies, My Winnipeg isn't "silent," or even confined exclusively to the distant past, but it gives its subject a fixed, eternal identity. "IF ONLY…" a recurring title card reads; to Maddin, his Winnipeg, built on disappointments and losses, is the birthplace of regret. By turns madcap and painfully nostalgic, it's at heart a mournful fugue to origins, aging, and something like forgiveness, familial and civic.

Maddin—that is, the questing narrator, who might bear roughly the same relationship to the director as the film's fanciful setting does to the real city—remembers living over the hair salon operated by his mother and aunt, a "gynocracy" whose air vent sends the odors of talc, shampoo, and purses into his room, all "the smells of female vanity and desperation." And so he begins exploring his identity as a Winnipegger via the "domestic experiment" of moving his octogenarian mother (Ann Savage, the wicked dame in Edgar G. Ulmer's 1945 Detour) back into his childhood home, along with young actors hired to play her children for the reenactment of their youthful crises. (How long-dead Dad is present is best discovered yourself.) Continue Reading »




Tags: ,

No Comments »

Lichman & Rizov "Live" at Grassroots Tavern (Episode 9: "*in which decorum, in the absence of all editorial guidance, goes out the proverbial window")

By John Lichman & Vadim Rizov

[Editor's Note: The views expressed in this podcast are those of the commenters, and do not necessarily reflect the official policies, positions, or opinions of The House Next Door.]

Continue Reading »




Tags: , , ,

No Comments »

Links for the Day (April 24th, 2008)

1. The NYPress 20th Anniversary Issue hit stands yesterday. Some highlights: Armond White addresses "What We Don't Talk About When We Talk About Movies" (excerpt below); Russ Smith mugs for the camera; Mishka Shubaly writes about "Not Making It" in The Big Apple; and Eric Kohn tries out Tribeca.

["These desperate stakes became even more alarming with the recent announcement of the Museum of the Moving Image's Second Annual Institute on Criticism and Feature Writing—a project seemingly designed to further confuse the profession. Offering a session on marketing and publicity, the MMI's Institute implies that flackery is part of critical journalism, and that's really the root of the problem—sanctioning the way in which critical journalism has blurred its mandate into promoting the industry, not the art form. It overlooks any chance for criticism to unite while enlightening the audience, keeping it divided. There is no "conversation" when what we say when we talk about movies is driven by elitism or commerce, both now horribly combined in Queens. Hollywood's emphasis on impersonal product then holds sway over art. Ideas get smothered in formula, and hype becomes the language of so-called discourse."] Continue Reading »




Tags:

46 Comments »