By odienator
Radio-Keith-Orpheum Pictures was the springboard for many of Hollywood's famous players, from David O. Selznick, George Cukor and Max Steiner behind the camera to Kate Hepburn and Cary Grant in front of it. One of the original Big Five studios, RKO became known for B-pictures, Astaire and Rogers musicals, screwball comedies like Bringing Up Baby, and a little movie by a young writer-director named Orson Welles. In Hollywood circles, RKO was also known for its constant financial problems; despite having successful runs under Selznick and King Kong creator Merian C. Cooper, the studio's extravagant spending often threatened its existence. The studio changed hands several times (most notably, Howard Hughes' hands) before its original incarnation was dissolved in 1959.
When cinematic crayon wielder Ted Turner bought RKO's library in 1987, no one knew the purchase was short six films. These films were recently discovered by Turner's cable outlet, Turner Classic Movies, and will join its rotation later in 2007. Five of these films have not been seen in any medium since 1959, and the sixth film was thought to be lost forever. These films, originally sold to Merian C. Cooper after he left the studio, are being presented as double features in a one-week retrospective starting today at New York City's Film Forum. The six films include pre-Hays Code and post-Code features, a film whose only surviving print has Dutch subtitles, and one of the strangest musicals ever produced.
Just for clarification, the Code I speak of is the Hays Code, which reminds us of what Hollywood wasn't allowed to do when it came into being, and also, as this still from Stingaree shows, what Hollywood was allowed to do. The retrospective kicks off today with a pre-Code double feature, Rafter Romance and Double Harness (both 1933).
Double Harness features William Powell one year before he became famous as perpetually drunk private dick Nick Charles in the Thin Man series. Its plot is decidedly B.C. (before Code, that is). "Marriage is the business of women," says Joan Colby (Ann Harding), and she makes an unwilling Powell her business partner the old fashioned way—she has her father (Henry Stephenson) catch them as in flagrante delicto as 1933 would allow. The Colby patriarch shames Powell into marrying his daughter because, I suppose, back then if you
got caught milking the cow for free, you had to buy her from the farmer. Their relationship goes about as well as one could expect from a "forced" marriage, but Harness manages to squeeze out a happy, though unbelievable, ending.
Directed by John Cromwell, father of actor James, Harness nonchalantly tosses in adultery, gold-digging, pre-marital sex and a few risqué lines, and while the Hays Office might have allowed some of these things in a tamer configuration, it never would have allowed the amoral depiction of them found here. Harding and her sister are determined to get married, but while her immature drunk of a sibling is marrying for "love," Harding approaches her societal entrapment like a businessman playing hardball. She's Joan Crawford if Crawford could have channeled her forthrightness into a sexy, deceptive form of charm.
Harness climaxes with an absurd dinner party that should have been more crazily depicted than Cromwell allows. It seems tacked on to pad the running time, but seeing two stereotypes—a stuffy English butler and a broken-English speaking Chinese cook—have a wrestling match in the kitchen is worth the price of admission.
Rafter Romance stars Ginger Rogers and Norman Foster as two people unknowingly sharing an attic apartment at the behest of their nice Jewish landlord (George Sidney), a man with the biggest hands I have ever seen. The landlord and his preternaturally happy wife (you know what they say about men with big hands?) meddle in the business of their tenants, bringing them (stereotype alert!) chicken soup and matchmaker advice while gently demanding the months of back rent they are owed. Said back rent is the plot device that leads artist Foster and telemarketer Rogers to their Ladyhawke-style living arrangement: she gets the apartment from 8 PM to 8 AM, and he gets it from 8AM to 8PM, and they are never to see nor interact with each other.
Of course, they do meet and they do interact, just not at the house. Foster and Rogers share a "meat cute," when he sees her framed in a giant sausage hanging in a butcher shop window. It gives him, and the viewer, some ideas Jimmy Dean wouldn't admit to having.
In case we missed the pre-Code subtlety, Romance gives us a shot of Foster's sketch of the event that made him fall in love with Rogers.
As Foster and Rogers woo each other in this incarnation, they wage war against each other in their apartment. Rogers thinks Foster is a bohemian and a slob, and Foster thinks she is an old maid from the 'burbs, but they never catch on in the identity department. They leave mean notes for each other, and play practical jokes that include ruining Foster's best suit and causing
Rogers to get a near concussion during a shower. The pre-shower scene, it should be noted, contains a shot of Rogers stepping out of her panties, something that would have killed Will Hays.
While watching Rafter Romance, I was struck by how alive William A. Seiter's direction is; he is truly in love with the camera and what it can do. There is a wonderful series of shots nearly every time the characters ascend or descend flights of tenement stairs. As we follow the characters, so does the camera, passing through the ceiling and the floor as the landings arrive. His direction saves the film from its two biggest
weaknesses, a rather lackluster script and Foster, one of the least charismatic leading men to grace a feature. "He's got to be screwing somebody famous in order to get into pictures," I thought. He was; in 1933 he was Mr. Claudette Colbert.
On February 26th , the Forum screens Living on Love (1937) and One Man's Journey (1933). The former is a post-Hays Code remake of Rafter Romance, and bests its original in every respect except direction and score. I would have loved to see what Seiter could have done with this script, but director Lew Landers' work is just fine. The plot is the same, except this time it's a basement apartment, the stereotype in the landlord's place is a Mammy-style Black woman, the lead actress (Whitney Bourne) sells electric shavers, and the lead actor (James Dunn) has talent and charisma to spare.
The post-Code differences here are stunning. For starters, the film takes a less raunchy approach to some of the same material. In Romance, Rogers' boss, Robert Benchley, makes repeated attempts to slip out of his wet clothes and into a dry Ginger ale; his attempts redefine
sexual harassment. In Living, Franklin Pangborn is more subtle, ("go out with me or I'll slit my wrists with an Anderson Electric Shaver") and his hits on Whitney Bourne are at one point reprimanded with a violently loud "NO!" There are no shots of anybody's bloomers, and Bourne's face appears between far less phallic sausages, though the verbiage next to that sausage picture leaves little to the imagination. "Take some home and frame the wife!" they proudly hail. Frame the wife with sausages?! Oh baby.
That last item shows a switch between 1933 and 1937 films; the early 30's were more concerned with images, and the latter 30's films, with the advent of the screwball comedy, relied on more verbal gymnastics. The censor's ears were more easily misled than his eyes. Living's script is consistently fast and funny, and there are scenes influenced by slapstick and screwball comedies. Couple that with two leads who have the required chemistry and you have a superior remake.
Understated and Lionel Barrymore do not belong in the same sentence, but in One Man's Journey, Barrymore's performance deserves that adjective. Barrymore plays a doctor in a small
town who spends his life helping residents who are too broke to go to the town's other doctor. After delivering a baby girl but failing to save her mother, Barrymore is ostracized by the town and forced to take the girl to raise, along with his 6-year old son, as his own daughter. Said ostracizing does not prevent every penniless Tom, Dick and Harry from seeking his services when health issues arise. Journey follows Barrymore's life over several years, stopping in on scenes of his now grown son (Joel McCrea of Sullivan's Travels) becoming a doctor, the romantic life of his "daughter" (Dorothy Jordan, Mrs. Merian C. Cooper), and his ultimate redemption in the eyes of the town. Director John S. Robertson keeps things moving at a nice pace, and also keeps Barrymore's teeth out of the scenery.
February 27-March 1 brings two must-see movies to the Forum, A Man To Remember and Stingaree. One of these is a post-Code remake and the best film in the series; the other must be seen to be believed.
A Man To Remember had not been seen since 1938 and was thought lost. According to the TCM press release, it existed only in the preserved Dutch language print the Forum and TCM will be showing. The film is in English, but the impossible-not-to-read subtitles are in Dutch. It is a jarring juxtaposition, as some scenes of written letters and signs show that they have been translated into Dutch, but this does not prevent the film from being a compelling piece of filmmaking.
The legend has it that when Garson Kanin went to Samuel Goldwyn asking to direct for his studio, Goldwyn said "How can you be a director? You've never directed." Kanin then negotiated for his release, and when Goldwyn refused, Kanin compared his tenure under Goldwyn to "slavery." "You're some slave," said Goldwyn. "If you were a slave of mine...I'd sell you!"
Kanin eventually got sold to RKO, and his directorial debut was A Man To Remember, a post-Code remake of One Man's Journey. Again, the differences between the two are striking. Journey features a scene where the doctor's daughter obviously has sex with her paramour. "Are you sorry you did it?" he asks her just before they crash while he's trying to get freaky with her on the ride home. No such scene exists in Remember, though the daughter's paramour does accidentally shoot her.
The overall tone is different as well. Robertson's direction is more matter-of-fact than emotional in its approach to the material, and his film is effective yet less sentimental. Kanin's film is structured like a weepie, opening with the death of the doctor (Edward Ellis, who played the titular character in The Thin Man) and flashing back to important moments in the doctor's life. The emotional pull is far stronger, and I wonder if this shift in tone was a precursor to the similarly structured pictures of the 40's. In the early 30's, it felt like audiences wanted their comedies to be exaggerated takes on the foibles of the rich or the common, but their dramas were desired straight, no melodramatic chaser. Barrymore's doctor's life follows a forward path, and there is no death scene. He goes through his motions and the film is quicker to observe rather than choreograph.
This is not meant as criticism toward A Man To Remember; it is easily the best film the series has to offer and is effective despite its lack of stars—or perhaps because of it. Kanin handles the flashback cliché with little trouble and the film, while melodramatic at times, is never manipulative or overdone. Remember adds three money-hungry characters who can't wait for Ellis' body to be cold before picking at his remains for debt settlement, and a shot of redemption and revenge from beyond the grave. One can see the structure that numerous future films would take in dealing with this type of material.
Ellis turns in a fine character performance, and he is ably assisted by Anne Shirley as his adopted daughter and Lee Bowman as his doctor son. Remember adds a level of tension between father and son that was not evident in its predecessor, and also the rare misstep of a confusing relationship between Shirley and Bowman. The script by Dalton Trumbo might explain why the film hadn't been seen since 1938. When RKO started piping its films through its TV affiliates via the Million Dollar Movie series, it would have been the height of the blacklist. Trumbo's name would have eliminated the ability to show the film anywhere in the U.S.
The New York Times put A Man to Remember as one of its ten best films of 1938, and I can't say I disagree with them.
Throughout this essay, I have been licking my lips and rubbing my hands together in anticipation because I can't wait to tell you just how messed up Stingaree is.
This is a western and a musical—an oxymoron almost as big as the RKO logo's slogan "A Radio Picture"—and the words "western and musical" should conjure up images of Paint Your Wagon in your head. This is far better than that hot mess, but Lord Still Have Mercy!
Where do I start? Stingaree is a bandit in Australia who's also a songwriter. Like Shaft, he has
his own theme song, and when he's not robbing from the rich, he's composing sappy music. He's half Robin Hood, half Robin Gibb! RKO super-celebrity Richard Dix plays Stingaree, and he rides into town to end up robbing songwriter Sir Julian Kent (Conway Tearle) and über-rich singer Mrs. Clarkson (a
hilarious Mary Boland) Kent is en route to hear sing. When you meet Mrs. Clarkson, and hear her sing, there won't be a dry eye—or an uncracked pair of eyeglasses—in the house. She is a hilariously bad, horrific soprano, and she sings a song with the lyrics "Yo ho! Yo ho! Yo ho! Yo ho! Yo ho ho ho ho ho ho ho ho ho ho hooooo! I wanna be a Fisherman!!!!" With lyrics like that, why not a pirate?
So far, we've got Robin Hood and American Idol. Stingaree then
adds the Cinderella factor: Mr. Clarkson (Stephenson again) loves Hilda Bouverie (Irene Dunne), but Mrs. Clarkson is a mean guardian to her. Hilda can sing, and secretly longs for an audience with Sir Julian, but Mrs. C will have none of that. The dresses worn by the women in these scenes have the same exaggerated posteriors as the wicked stepsisters in Disney's Cinderella. You could sit a cup and saucer on the enhanced booty in this film—Sir Mix-a-Lot's eyes would fall out. Especially guilty is the cockney maid played by Una O'Connor. She's decrepit old, but when she turns around, you'll swear she's 21.
Don't ask me how, but Stingaree shows up in the guise of Sir Julian, hears Hilda sing, and then asks her to sing a song he's composed called "Tonight Is Mine". It is the first of 7 gazillion times we will hear this song, and while Irene Dunne may have been Jerome Kern's favorite soprano, she still has to sing these wretched lyrics. Stingaree's biggest crime begins with an 'R', but it ain't robbery, it's 'riting.
Stingaree, along with his sidekick Andy Devine, kidnaps Hilda and
takes her to the woods. Since this is pre-Code, Stingaree gives Hilda a stolen dress she will put on after undressing in front of both Devine and Stingaree. This leads to a scene where Dunne gets done by Dick Dix's dick while Devine dutifully doesn't disturb them despite drooling.
Still with me? Time to add A Star is Born. Stingaree gets purposefully imprisoned, giving up his career so that Hilda can have the singing career he thinks she deserves. Hilda goes off with Sir Julian, who makes her a star but can't seem to get her to give up what's under that big butt dress. The way the film invokes memories of Stingaree while Sir Julian tries to work his mojo must be seen to be believed. "Are we ever going to have a honeymoon?" asks Sir Julian. Hilda is just about to give it up, then Una O'Connor's maid in the other room starts up the music box that Stingaree gave Hilda (it plays "Tonight is Mine", of course) and Hilda ends the honeymoon early.
How this ends I'll leave up to you to discover, but discover you must. Stingaree needs to be on a double bill with something like Otto Preminger's Skidoo.
__________________________________________________
The "RKO Lost & Found" series runs from February 23rd—March 2nd, 2007 at New York City's Film Forum.
I have been waiting years to see _Stingaree_. If I can't be at the Film Forum, at least I can try to remember to catch it on TCM in April.
Odie, just out of curiosity for how these things work, did you basically attend a critics screening before writing this piece?
Anon
Ginger Rogers and the title, Rafter Romance just seem made for each other.
Wow! Just wow. I'll be looking for these on TCM, unless they come out on DVD sooner. Three cheers for pre-Code!!!
Anon, I attended a critics screening of Rafter Romance, but was unable to make the other screening due to work. So the nice folks at the Forum loaned me screener DVD's for this piece. I watched the other 5 films from those DVD's, including Stingaree, which I swear I wish I'd seen in the theater.
Wagstaff, I wonder if TCM is going to put these on DVD. I would love to see some behind the scenes information on the features. I just have screeners, which usually don't have any extra info on them. I'll have to ask the Forum folks.
Jeffrey, Ginger Rogers was made to be seen through sausage!
Film Forum only screened two of the six films for critics, and of those, the only one I can vouch for is "Rafter Romance," which I had the privilege of attending alongside Odienator, who had a heavenly grin on his face when Ginger Rogers began stripping to her unmentionables. That "meat cute" he refers to — great phrase! — is a mind-bender, the sort of thing that will remind anyone who needs reminding that sex wasn't invented in the 1960s. The imagery is so blatant that calling it Freudian would do injustice to Freud. When that painting flashes onscreen, Odie and I simultaneously exchanged a, "You've got to be kidding me — Did you see that, too?" expression. It's basically what you'd call a programmer — something to fill out a long bill of fare back in the days when movies were basically TV (a slightly disreputable but fun and affordable way for the masses to kill half a day). It's slow and thin. But it's very, very entertaining, thanks to the spot-on performances (except for Norman Foster, who's pretty much charisma-free — what powerful person's cousin was he?); the photography, which has a tactile solidity, with the exquisite attention to the grey scale that was typical of pre-color filmmaking; and Seiter's direction, which seems to favor short lenses that exaggerate perspective lines and complement the already-cartoonish performances by making everyone seem to have been drawn by Winsor McKay. Odie and I agreed that the movie's style reminded us of the Coen brothers — particularly a long-take sequence of characters moving up and down stairs that uses an elevator-style crane shot to show off a dandy ant-farm set.
MZS: When that painting flashes onscreen, Odie and I simultaneously exchanged a, "You've got to be kidding me — Did you see that, too?" expression.
Matt can also attest that I really, really tried not to laugh like a guilty teenage boy, but failed miserably. I almost fell out of my chair. I think I was in shock.
Since I liked Seiter's direction, I looked up movies that he directed. The only other one I can recall seeing is One Touch of Venus, which was the Mannequin of 1948.
Some of the imagery and dialogue in these pre-Code movies make my head spin. In Double Harness, Harding's married gold-digger sister is being pursued by the horniest guy in the RKO series. His eyes are as big as saucers whenever he's talking to her. The dialogue implies that he's willing to barter bling-bling for booty, and I thought that was a tad risque. A little later, Sis tells Harding about the guy: "He wants to make love to me." I was stunned by those exact words being used, not to mention the way her voice implied "and I'm gonna fuck him too."
I know sex wasn't invented in the 60′s–I saw Hedy Lamarr's 1932 movie Ecstacy–but it still catches me by surprise because I'm subconsciously thinking "old movie, can't be nasty!"
Odienator: To be fair to old movies, I am pretty sure that the phrase "Make love to" had a much more general meaning today than it did in the second half of the 20th century and beyond. Something like, "Passionately embrace and express affection for…" Of course there was some, er, wiggle room for other interpretations, but it seems implausible to me that an otherwise fairly discreet popular culture would allow this particular phrase a mulligan.
When, during the phone scene of "It's a Wonderful Life," Donna Reed hollers to her prying mom, "He's making violent love to me, mother!" I don't think she meant it in the post-1960s connotation, but I love the assumption that she did, because it gives modern audiences an immediate reason (however false) to think that Post Code movies were risque when they wanted to be. Sort of like in "Bringing up Baby" when Cary Grant, dressed in a woman's bathrobe, exclaims "I just went gay all of a sudden!" he doesn't mean in the post-Stonewall sense — though the beauty of this phrase, like the other one, is that it probably had a certain subtext that audiences got without having it spelled out for them. (In 1938, if you saw the leading man lounging around in a woman's robe, what else would you think?)
I'm not a linguist, though, so if anybody wants to get definitive on me here, I'd welcome it.
Also, in that example you give, I think the subext in the sis' delivery might have been necessary to put that phrase over into the risque zone — otherwise it would have meant something more square, more Introduction to Romantic Poetry.
Matt, based on the scene that came prior to it, I'm sure sis meant "screw" when she uttered her phrase. That whole movie is about using the pudenda to trap a man.
You may be right about other instances, though. When they wanted to actually imply sex, they said something more innuendoish. Or did they really mean it even when it was innuendo?
Pepe Le Moko: Well, here we are at de Casbah, mon cheri. (Hands her a trumpet)
Her: What's this?
Pepe Le Moko: I said we would make beautiful music at the casbah, no?
Her: Oh!! I thought you meant we were gonna fu-
Anyway! Maybe I just have a dirty mind. All this time, I thought Barbara Billingsley was talking about something else when she said "Gee, Ward, you were kinda hard on the beaver last night." She was actually talking about Jerry Mathers, which is even nastier now that I think about it.
In Living, Franklin Pangborn is more subtle, ("go out with me or I'll slit my wrists with an Anderson Electric Shaver") and his hits on Whitney Bourne are at one point reprimanded with a violently loud "NO!" There are no shots of anybody's bloomers, and Bourne's face appears between far less phallic sausages, though the verbiage next to that sausage picture leaves little to the imagination. "Take some home and frame the wife!" they proudly hail. Frame the wife with sausages?! Oh baby.
Okay, I have to see this movie now.
Innuendo is a fine art; if every man, woman and child knows exactly what's actually being discussed (i.e., blatant subtlety) then it's not really innuendo, is it?
The inability or unwillingness to come right out and say something (or show something) can become a shared joke, kind of a conspiracy between the filmmaker and the audience. One of my favorite late examples is the final three shots of "North by Northwest," which, if memory serves, go like this: (1) Martin Landau falls to his death off Mt. Rushmore, Cary Grant offers a hand up to Eva Marie Saint; (2) cut to Grant and Saint in the train compartment, him lifting her up into a sleeper bunk; (3) cut to the train going into a tunnel.
It's almost as if Hitchcock was saying, "It's 1959, people — adults shouldn't kid each other." And a year later he directed "Psycho."
I have a theory that if Hitchcock had imbibed a youth potion and continued to make movies for another forty years, he would have made many of the same choices, stylewise and content-wise, as De Palma. Evidence: "Frenzy," a thoroughly nasty movie that leaves less to the imagination than any other Hitchcock film. Also I seem to remember a description in "The Dark Side of Genius" of a sequence he wanted to shoot that involved crosscutting between some impending violent act and a woman masturbating. Very De Palma.
MZS: Also I seem to remember a description in "The Dark Side of Genius" of a sequence he wanted to shoot that involved crosscutting between some impending violent act and a woman masturbating. Very De Palma.
Very Body Double indeed. I agree with you about Hitch turning into DePalma if he had been around to make more movies after Family Plot. He would have made DePalma obsolete! (I hear the gasp of the DePalma lovers, some of whom are getting their guns to come after me.)
To tie back into our topic, of course Hitch directed Suspicion for RKO.
Tram: These movies will be on TCM in April. I'll pop back out on The House and remind people–especially when Stingaree comes on. Instead of popcorn, the Forum should sell sausages.
Just to respond to Matt's question, "Norman Foster — who's cousin was he?P Foster was a successful Broadway actor who was married at the time to Claudette Colbert. He later (wisely)retired from acting and went into direction, where he launched and directed the most interesting installments of Fox's "Mr. Moto" series, as well as "Journey into Fear" for Orson Welles. He's an interesting cat.
Dave
Dave:
Yeah, I know about Foster's backstory — and Odie actually mentioned the Colbert connection in his piece. I was trying to be sarcastic, along the lines of, "Wonder who he was sleeping with?" Unfortunately that doesn't always come across in print.
I dig that you used the word "cat," though. I thought I was the only person born after 1960 who did that.