The House Next Door

Author Archive

The Spielberg Blogathon: Indy Edition

Today marks the start of Ryan Kelly and Adam Zanzie's Spielberg blogathon. Click this link to visit the hosting site. In honor of the event, the House here reposts our 2008 coverage of the four Indiana Jones films: Odienator on Raiders of the Lost Ark, Matt Zoller Seitz on Temple of Doom and myself on Last Crusade and Kingdom of the Crystal Skull.—Keith Uhlich

A Well-Oiled Machine: Raiders of the Lost Ark

Raiders of the Lost Ark

When re-releasing their beloved E.T. and Star Wars trilogy for a new generation of viewers, Steven Spielberg and George Lucas angered the films' original fans by committing crimes of digital alteration. Spielberg turned government agents' guns into walkie-talkies, removing the few justifiable hints of menace in E.T. Lucas' sins guaranteed him a lower circle of Hell: he added special effects using technology then unavailable to him, which upset purists like me; he changed character motivations; worst of all, he recast an actor in the ghostly final shot of Return of the Jedi (substituting Hayden Christensen, young Anakin Skywalker in the prequels, for Sebastian Shaw, who played the older, unmasked Anakin in the film proper) for the sole purpose of trying to convince us that the second trilogy deserved to be mentioned in the same breath as the first. Granted, these are Spielberg and Lucas' films, and they can butcher them at will, but in making the original versions hard to obtain on home video, it felt as if they were rewriting history. Imagine the rabid anti-smokers digitally redoing Paul Henreid's famous Now, Voyager cigarette lighting scene with Twizzlers. Continue Reading »




Tags: , , , , , , , ,

4 Comments »

Fly, Ryan Murphy! Be Free!

Glee Does Rocky Horror

Dear Ryan Murphy:

Be crazy.

By crazy, I mean unhinged, unpredictable and inspired. Think Bob Clampett going full-tilt surreal in Porky in Wackyland. Or Chuck Jones starting out spoofing opera in What's Opera, Doc?, then building to a climax of thunderous spectacle and heartfelt emotion that wipes the smile off your face (until Bugs Bunny restores it with, "Well, what did you expect in an opera...a happy ending?") Think Frank Tashlin building a live-action cartoon around his already-cartoony leading man, Jerry Lewis. Or Bob Fosse directing an autobiographical musical fantasia while he was still alive, and structuring the entire thing as a deathbed flashback, and devoting the film's final third to musical hospital staff and equipment as bits of mise-en-scène. Think Alfred Hitchcock staging entire feature films in single locations (Lifeboat, Rope, Rear Widow), ending The Birds with an eerie, almost European-art-film-like anticlimax, and killing off his leading lady in Psycho 40 minutes into the film and turning his focus to her killer, and making you think he'd killed his leading lady in Vertigo only to have her show up again during the film's second half, by way of setting up an even darker, sicker, more moving story than the one you were already watching. Continue Reading »




Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

1 Comment »

Lock & Load

A video essay about the role of guns in film, presented by Capital and Matt Zoller Seitz.




Tags: ,

1 Comment »

When should a director stop messing with a movie?

Director's CutsSitting in my in box is a press release about a Blu-Ray edition of The Last of the Mohicans that's being hyped as "an all-new director's definitive cut by acclaimed director Michael Mann."

The phrase "definitive cut" made me laugh. I like Mann's films a lot, but definitive he ain't. He's a serial recutter, and this is his third go-round with Mohicans. The first was the 1992 theatrical cut, which remained unchanged until 1999, when Mann released a second version on DVD that removed four minutes but added eight (mostly small moments of character development). I have no idea what this new version will contain, and frankly I'm in no hurry to find out, or buy the disc, for that matter. Why? Because I don't want to encourage Mann to continue tinkering with his movies—and because the entire phenomenon of director's cuts and definitive director's cuts and restored cuts and expanded cuts and alternate cuts has gotten out of hand and needs to stop.

Except, of course, when I like the result. I'm flighty that way.




Tags: , , ,

2 Comments »

The secret ambition of Salt (and Angelina Jolie)

Salt

I went into Salt expecting a big, loud, incoherent, derivative action film without a single smart bone in its plasticized body. A film with no personality, no taste, no sense of style. And yet another film that makes you wonder whatever happened to Angelina Jolie, whose acclaimed early work in Girl, Interrupted, the HBO biopic Gia and the TNT miniseries George Wallace marked her as a potentially great screen star, a ferociously charismatic actress in a pinup girl's body.

What I saw, to my surprise and delight, was the best pure action film to come out of Hollywood in a long time, featuring Jolie's most multilayered, carefully calibrated performance in ages (though so minimalist and unassuming that inattentive critics won't notice), and action scenes so extravagantly absurd but smartly staged and executed that the movie's DVD should be placed alongside Speed, Die Hard and the original The Matrix on a shelf marked THIS IS HOW TO DO IT.




Tags: , ,

1 Comment »

The Whispering Wind: Matt Zoller Seitz on The New World

The New World

As Terrence Malick's The New World eases into its climactic movement, its heroine Pocahontas enters the latest (but not last) phase of her journey. Once a Powhatan princess, she became the lover of convict-turned-explorer John Smith; then a diplomat taking pity on Smith's stubborn, hapless countrymen; then a pariah cast out by her father as a betrayer; then a slowly assimilating Englishwoman and grieving (presumed) widow, deceived into thinking Smith dead; then a ward—and later, lover—of a kind Englishman, John Rolfe; the toast of Rolfe's mother country; then a contented wife living in a high-ceilinged manor in which she welcomes Smith as her guest.

Now she is about to become, in Rolfe's words, "but a fond memory" to a son that barely knew her.

Pocahontas's toddler-aged son runs along a hedgerow amid a flock of sheep. The camera follows like a tagalong ghost. The wind comes up.
The wind signals that the movie is over—that the end is near.

But what follows is a beginning.

Malick understands the aesthetic potential of sound. The sound design on his four features—Badlands (1973), Days of Heaven (1978), The Thin Red Line (1998) and The New World (2005)—marries precision and depth and is as meticulously timed and orchestrated as his editing. In a review of The New World, I described the director's style as "epic naturalism," a mode that combines "classical Hollywood production values (including Cinemascope photography and an eclectic symphonic score) with a documentary approach to narrative, characterization, and editing." These aspects might seem incompatible—Hollywood gloss plus indie grit. But in Malick's films they work in tandem, and sound design is a big part of the reason why.

Malick's attention to detail is positively Kubrickian. I once got an email from a researcher entrusted with gathering bird sounds for The New World. She told me that Malick had contacted her and her ornithologist colleagues asking if they could help fill the movie's soundscape with recordings of every Jamestown-area bird that still existed today. If a particular bird was extinct, he wanted a recording of a species that was somewhere in the ballpark. They spent weeks gathering birdsong recordings, and they all ended up in the movie, mostly unadorned.




Tags: , , , , ,

No Comments »

Summer of '85: Tickle Us, St. Elmo's Fire

[Editor's Note: This is the latest entry in our annual "Summer of…" series, copresented by Aaron Aradillas of Blog Talk Radio's Back By Midnight and Jamey DuVall and Jerry Dennis of Blog Talk Radio's Movie Geeks United!. Until June 19th, we'll be publishing retrospective pieces on films released during the dog days of 1985. We're accepting submissions all the way up until close date, so get in touch (keithuhlich@gmail.com) if you'd like to contribute. And keep checking in with Aaron, Jamey and Jerry's shows for 1985-themed tribute episodes.]

St. Elmo's Fire

St. Elmo's Fire, viewed before its release as a Woodstock of sorts for '80s-film supergroup the Brat Pack, turned into the beginning of the end for said Pack the minute it hit screens—and not just because the entire Brat Pack concept was a media chimera. The film's sole reason for existing was evidently to put Brats Emilio Estevez, Judd Nelson, Demi Moore, Andrew McCarthy, Rob Lowe and Ally Sheedy in the same movie together; the only bigger afterthought than Mare Winningham is the brittle, stagey script, which fails to descend to the level of campy badness and merely bores instead.

Ali Arikan, Sarah D. Bunting and Matt Zoller Seitz took a look at St. Elmo's Fire and tried to diagnose the main cause of its dull malaise. Read on for their conclusions—or, if you're short on time, scroll to the end for some self-portraits of their time in the trenches. Continue Reading »




Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

14 Comments »

Why Glee is this century's Twin Peaks

Glee

Fox's Glee…is one of the most stylistically bold broadcast network shows since Twin Peaks. That might seem an unlikely claim on first glance: Glee is a feather-light comedy at least 70 percent of the time, and a glib, mannered one at that. From its wistful-kooky incidental music to its subtext-as-text quips (Noah "Puck" Puckerman: "That Rachel chick makes me wanna light myself on fire, but she can sing"), Glee is shellacked in cuteness. And its subject matter—the private and public melodramas of high school students and teachers—is the stuff that dismissive reactions are made of.

What's radical about the series—which was created by Nip/Tuck mastermind Ryan Murphy—is its direct, at times nearly primordial sincerity, expressed mostly in its musical numbers. The musical moments seem indebted to English writer-producer Dennis Potter (Pennies From Heaven), who used fantasy lip-sync interludes to explore the feelings that repressed middle-class English citizens could not otherwise show. Similar moments on Glee stand in opposition to the majority of American popular culture, which fears simple, sincere expressions of feeling the way little boys fear cooties.




Tags: , ,

2 Comments »

5 on 24

The May 24 finale of the political-action series 24 marks the end of one of the most stylistically fresh and politically controversial programs in broadcast TV history. The video essay series "5 on 24" examines various aspects of the show, including its real-time structure, its depiction of torture, and the psychology of its hero, counterterrorist agent Jack Bauer.

For Matt and Aaron's written musings on the show over at Moving Image Source, start here.




Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

1 Comment »

Michael Douglas: The last great antihero

Solitary Man"There is nothing noble in failure," says Ben Kalmen, the protagonist of the dark comedy Solitary Man. And he knows whereof he speaks. Ben is a disgraced former used car dealer and insatiable womanizer who once had all the outward trappings of success (stable marriage, lots of money, a degree of celebrity), and mysteriously and systematically began to destroy all of it. By the time the film's main action begins, he's a magnificent wreck of a man who's slowly learning that the world isn't responsible for his misery—he is.

Happily, Ben's dictum about failure doesn't apply to movies. Failure itself isn't noble or heroic or innately interesting; it's just a human condition like any other. But because mainstream American cinema tends to cower in fear of any behavior it considers unsympathetic and any circumstance it considers unhappy, a film about failure possesses a small degree of nobility right out of the gate. You just don't see that kind of film every day. What such a movie does after that is, of course, up to the filmmakers and the actors. Luckily, Solitary Man is funny and absorbing, and it features a lead performance by Michael Douglas that's both hugely entertaining in itself, and fascinating for the way it illuminates the actor's long, colorful career. Ben Kalmen isn't just a worthy addition to Douglas' personal rogues gallery; he seems to contain bits and pieces of all of them.

Six-and-a-half years prior to the film's main action, for reasons even he doesn't understand, Ben started systematically and intentionally ruining his life. His prolonged orgy of self-destruction was triggered by possibly catastrophic medical news. I say "possibly" because Ben never even learned what, if anything, was wrong with his health. In the film's prologue, a doctor tells him, "I don't love your EKG"—a wonderfully smarmy preface to everyone's worst nightmare—and he flees the office rather than hear the details.




Tags: , , , , , , ,

No Comments »

Reviews: Robin Hood and Looking for Eric

Robin HoodThere are two kinds of bad films: actively bad and passively bad.

Actively bad movies are engaging. They're technically competent but utterly nonsensical (and/or offensive), or else so astoundingly inept in every conceivable way that they're mesmerizing. The greatest actively bad films think they're masterpieces and carry themselves with an unearned aura of importance. But whatever subgroup of active badness a film falls into, it's fun. It grabs you. It has personality, attitude, a sense of life.

The passively bad film offers no such compensations. It's jumbled, tangled, sluggish, with different impulses working at cross-purposes and canceling each other out. It never gets a handle on what it wants to say or why it wants to say it, and it has a tendency to pander. Watching a passively bad film is like trying to swim through Jell-O. It wears you out and saps your spirit. By the end, you feel deflated and defeated, as if you've spent several hours coolly waiting in line at a bus station or doctor's office or the DMV only to have the functionary behind the glass put up a "Closed" sign and tell you to try again tomorrow.

Passive badness, thy name is Robin Hood.




Tags: , , , ,

No Comments »

It came from Metropolis: The legacy of a classic

MetropolisThe original science fiction blockbuster, Fritz Lang's Metropolis is a high-water mark in the late silent era. Released in 1927, the same year as the first talkie, The Jazz Singer, it's a parable of class struggle, foregrounding issues that obsessed 1920s audiences and that have persisted through the present: the oppressive scale of modern cities, the exploitation of the lower classes by the powerful, and the allure of technology, which is presented by Lang as something akin to dark magic.

Beyond any of that, Metropolis is eye candy, bankrolled by its studio, UFA, in hopes of dazzling audiences the world over, and perhaps giving German film some traction in the coveted U.S. market. Lang, among the most sadistic of movie visionaries, led hundreds of designers and craftspeople and tens of thousands of extras to push analog filmmaking to its conceptual limits (and his insistence on doing dozens of takes of certain scenes pushed his collaborators to their physical limits). Metropolis was the most expensive film made up until that time. But as studio bean counters still say, every penny (or Deutsche Mark) is on the screen.

Paramount, the film's U.S. production partner, severely cut Metropolis so that theater exhibitors could schedule more showings per day. Film scholars' 80-year quest to find and restore the excised material ended last week when a 25-minutes-longer version, which uses recovered and restored footage to flesh out the film's plot and characters and burnish its themes, debuted at New York's Film Forum.

Film Salon celebrates the pop culture legacy of Lang's film with the following, highly subjective list of movies that crib from the film's iconic imagery: an elegant female robot born in a storm of man-made lightning; oppressed workers toiling in dingy subterranean factories; a city of Art Deco skyscrapers ringed by elevated train tracks and swarmed by prop planes and zeppelins. Entries are arranged in chronological order by release date. Add your own favorites to the comments section.




Tags: , ,

No Comments »

Trash Humpers and the Art of Harmony Korine's Poet-Pranksterism

Trash Humpers

Harmony Korine's 79-minute feature Trash Humpers is built around the antics of caricatured redneck freakazoids—two men and a woman wearing what look like flesh masks on loan from the Texas Chainsaw Massacre films. They dance in parking lots and alleys, break glass, dry-hump trash cans, and jerk off (and/or fellate) tree branches, pausing to yowl insults at one another and holler like hillbillies in an old Bugs Bunny cartoon. Returning home to their working-class duplex, the central trio is joined by two more characters that could be friends, relatives, or slaves (maybe all three?). They cook pancakes for the main trio, then join them at a dinner table and eat the pancakes with dish soap. At first I thought we were supposed to read them as conjoined twins because their skulls are tethered by what appear to be sock tentacles, but sometimes they remove the socks and move about autonomously, and in the movie's lyrical high point, one of them stands in a basement and delivers a monologue about what the world might look like if humans had no heads. There's one other semi-important character, a prepubescent boy in a black suit who bashes a doll with a hammer. For some reason (his unadorned face, perhaps), he struck me as the most normal person in the movie. Continue Reading »




Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

No Comments »

Superheroes Suck

Superheroes SuckAs Whiplash, the hateful Slavic super-genius who challenges armor-plated industrialist Tony Stark (Robert Downey Jr.) in Iron Man 2, Mickey Rourke has a Boris Badenov accent, greasy hair, a pencil mustache and a predatory stare that would give Mike Tyson pause. The man doesn't look at people, he looks through them. It's the stare of a stone thug—a gangsta badass who came up from nothing and would be content to make do with nothing for the rest of his life, as long as he had the freedom to roam and the ability to create. Whiplash is surrounded by technology, by money, by the most spectacular comic book vistas that Hollywood can buy, and he can barely muster the energy to sneer.

Whiplash has the right idea.

The comic book film has become a gravy train to nowhere. The genre cranks up directors' box office averages and keeps offbeat actors fully employed for years at a stretch by dutifully replicating (with precious few exceptions) the least interesting, least exciting elements of its source material; spicing up otherwise rote superhero vs. supervillain storylines with "complications" and "revisions" (scare quotes intentional) that the filmmakers, for reasons of fiduciary duty, cannot properly investigate; and delivering amusing characterizations, dense stories or stunning visuals while typically failing to combine those aspects into a satisfying whole.




Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

4 Comments »

The Ties of Zodiac

To view the video essay in its original context at the L Magazine, click here.




Tags: , ,

No Comments »