Connect with us

Film

Review: Hostel

3.0

Published

on

Hostel

One felt instant sympathy for the two unlucky American backpackers in John Landis’s An American Werewolf in London because they were basically sweet, goofy guys with a cheerfully ironic sense of humor. It was painful to watch one of them turn into a “human meatloaf” of the undead and the other to suffer tragically through a hellish lycanthropic curse. But the times have changed, and our American backpackers in the 2000s, as evidenced by the two guys in Eli Roth’s Hostel, have become coarse and jaded. They’re just as horny, but they want thrills and they want them now, and it doesn’t matter how vapid or graphic or perverse, as long as it’s fast, cheap, and out of control.

Anyone who’s worked in an office where some dim-bulb jock type delights in emailing video clips of defecation fetishes or girls vomiting on each other will instantly recognize the two American yokels who traverse through Eastern Europe in Hostel searching for foreign chicks to satisfy their whims. Film Freak Central‘s Walter Chaw was revolted by the film’s pointlessness and artlessness. “t’s homophobic, misogynistic, and just as dangerous and juvenile as a fraternity hazing,” he claims. Never one to pull punches when it comes to combating ignorance, Chaw is certainly on the right track. He has hit the nail on the head when it comes to describing the mindset of backpackers Paxton (confident Jay Hernandez) and Josh (self-effacing Derek Richardson), not to mention their “king of swing” Icelandic buddy Oli (Eythor Gudjonsson), who loves dropping his pants at every opportunity and proclaiming he’s shaved his ass cheeks as well as his balls. These men are pigs, but what makes Hostel both cathartic and unnerving is its presentation of such pigs being brought into a virtual slaughterhouse for our sadistic viewing pleasure.

When extreme, body-crunching violence is inflicted on these pigs, the playing field gets leveled. Viewers who identify with the pigs, or simply loathe them, are asked to sit through a descent into unadulterated depravity—though you can’t say they didn’t “ask for it.” They wanted sin, right? Well, they get it in spades. Paxton, Josh, and Oli are told about a remote Slovakian hostel where the women go sexually wild for foreigners. It isn’t long before three heavily accented, slinky Slovakians lure our heroes out to an all-night club for some passionate sexual hijinks. (Readers who plan to bear witness to the gut-wrenching horrors of Hostel are advised to stop reading here, since the movie takes a turn toward the mysterious after this night of partying.) When someone from the hostel goes missing, our dim-witted American heroes chalk it up to “things being different in a foreign country.” I wonder if the Jiminy Crickets in the audience will add “xenophobic” to their conscience thought-bubbles, since the villagers are presented as unsavory types, though one might argue the American characters are themselves xenophobic and get their just desserts for being vapid, racist, sexist, obnoxious pigs.

I’m not sure how much thought Roth put into how we the audience should feel about the characters in Hostel. I assume he simply thought Paxton and Josh were funny. His movie is deliberately free of subtext, and there’s no deep hidden critique of the free-spirited American abroad. What’s more interesting is that no matter how much you dislike Paxton and Josh at first glance, one is bound to empathize with them as Hostel draws on. It takes a turn toward the unapologetically violent, as mean and visceral as the limb-chopping finale of Audition (Takashi Miike has a memorable cameo as a persona of evil in Hostel) or the gory, Greek tragedy tongue slicing in Oldboy. But the immoderate blood shedding of Audition or Oldboy felt like artistic provocation. Roth just wants to provide sensations, and plenty of them. It’s a torture show in underground basements, where the victims are handcuffed and bound in chairs forced to endure unspeakable torment. That’s not hyperbole, either. Roth doesn’t look away when characters are brutalized, and if you don’t have the stomach for watching a character try to cross the floor with nearly chopped-off ankles, this is not the movie for you. (I’m sure you can find a DVD of March of the Penguins instead.)

Hostel is in the tradition of nasty cinema from the ‘70s and ‘80s that wondered how much gore spectacle a viewer could endure. It might be simply repulsive if the frat boy heroes weren’t such obnoxious turn offs for me in the early going. It reminds me of a recent dialogue I had with a college professor, who claimed she enjoyed watching horror films where college students die, because it cathartically purged her hostility toward some of her pupils. “Let’s face it,” she said, “most viewers went to House of Wax to see Paris Hilton die.” She may be right. But Hostel doesn’t achieve the effect of having you sympathize with the monster (as we do in The Texas Chain Saw Massacre when Leatherface panics after dispatching his third victim, running to the window in fear as if to say, “Where are these people coming from? Why can’t they leave me alone?”) We’re never privileged to know the monsters, whereas we do know the asshole characters they are brutalizing. It has a strange effect: instant empathy for a character we may have instinctively disliked. As Hostel moves into its funhouse final act where the sole survivor works overtime to escape the charnel-house, Roth pulls off the impossible, in that we want “Paris Hilton” to live (maybe minus a few fingers, though).

Has Roth grown as a filmmaker since his debut Cabin Fever? He remains purposefully, deliberately sophomoric in his approach to character, dialogue, and situations. If you replaced every single one of his actors with the kids from South Park, you’d have exactly the same movie (and the added benefit of the pop-culture irony the South Park creators provide that Roth remains infuriatingly oblivious to). Still, Roth delivers on the visceral, jaw-ripping horror. He knows how to cinematically build a frightening sequence and deliver on it with a Grand Guignol payoff. Anyone who thinks he’s making a cattle prod whose sole purpose is to shock may well be right, but what’s different about Hostel is its maker’s slow, deliberate willingness to go all the way without flinching. It’s discomfort taken to the level of the cathartic. I hesitate to criticize my colleague Walter Chaw for labeling it corrupt; but its very corruption is what makes it what it is—and that can’t be separated from the audacity of the final product. Hostel is one nasty apple.

Cast: Jay Hernandez, Derek Richardson, Eythor Gudjonsson, Barbora Nedeljáková, Jana Kaderabrova, Jan Vlasák, Rick Hoffman, Jennifer Lim, Takashi Miike Director: Eli Roth Screenwriter: Eli Roth Distributor: Lions Gate Films Running Time: 95 min Rating: R Year: 2005 Buy: Video, Soundtrack

Advertisement
Comments

Film

Review: The Hippy-Dippy Out of Blue Suggests a New-Age Law & Order

Carol Morley’s film wants to blow our minds, but it succeeds only at rousing our boredom.

1.5

Published

on

Out of Blue

Carol Morley’s Out of Blue begins with images of a supernova as an ostensibly brilliant astrophysicist, Jennifer Rockwell (Mamie Gummer), wonderingly intones that we’re all made of stardust. This meaningless observation, cribbed from Joni Mitchell’s hippy-dippy “Woodstock,” is an appropriate opening to a film that will prove to be every bit as trite, over-reaching, and goofy as its opening lines. With its endless references to black holes, the multiverse, and Schrödinger’s cat—the last of which is outlined in detail not once but twice—Morley’s film wants to blow our minds, but it succeeds only at rousing our boredom.

Loosely based on the novel Night Train by Martin Amis, Out of Blue attempts to combine the heady philosophizing of True Detective with the home-spun surrealism of Twin Peaks, but Morley’s writing is so ham-handed and her directing so blandly nondescript that the film ends up feeling more like a protracted new-age spin on Law & Order. It doesn’t speak well of Out of Blue that the film is at its most compelling when it’s just straight-up ripping off David Lynch’s stylistic idiosyncrasies, such as in a dream sequence where Jennifer lip synchs to an old-timey country song on a bandstand that looks nearly identical to the Roadhouse stage.

The plot, too, is suspiciously reminiscent of Twin Peaks: An enigmatic detective, Mike Hoolihan (Patricia Clarkson), investigates the brutal murder of a pretty young blonde (Gummer), which brings her into contact with an assortment of local oddballs. Out of Blue lacks the regional specificity of Lynch’s series—the film is set in New Orleans but you wouldn’t know that from what’s on screen—and its eccentrics, while played by fascinating character actors like Toby Jones, Jacki Weaver, and James Caan, are too vaguely drawn to be particularly memorable. But the biggest misstep is Mike herself, a blank-slate cipher who spends much of the film muttering clues under her breath and staring into the middle distance.

Of course, Mike has a dark past herself, one which, naturally, is intertwined with the mystery she’s trying to solve. Clarkson does her best to imbue the role with a certain offbeat gravitas, but Mike is too confusedly conceived to generate any real interest in her backstory, much less to carry the narrative. Morley hangs a lot of eccentricities on the character—she drives a vintage car, listens to the Eels, and, in one particularly baffling scene, climbs on stage at a strip club and starts writhing on the dancers—but none of these cohere into a comprehensible whole. To the end, Mike’s quirks exude a grab-bag-like feeling, ensuring that she remains an enigma amid the comings and goings of so many wacky side characters and all the pseudo-metaphysical blather of Morley’s muddled, unconvincing, and dull script.

Cast: Mamie Gummer, Patricia Clarkson, James Caan, Jacki Weaver, Toby Jones, Aaron Tveit, Jonathan Majors, Alyshia Ochse, Gary Grubbs, Yolonda Ross, Lucy Faust, Brad Mann, Thomas Francis Murphy, Carol Sutton, Lawrence Turner Director: Carol Morley Screenwriter: Carol Morley Distributor: IFC Films Running Time: 109 min Rating: NR Year: 2018

Continue Reading

Film

Review: Genesis Lyrically Captures the Heartache of Sentimental Education

Philippe Lesage’s film understands that we submit ourselves to the perils of affection because of its outweighing graces.

3

Published

on

Genesis
Photo: Productions l'Unite Centrale

Writer-director Philippe Lesage follows up The Demons with another coming-of-age saga that fixates on the relatable, if grim, blues of self-awakening. Primarily following the teenaged Guillaume (Théodore Pellerin) and his college-aged sister, Charlotte (Noée Abita), Genesis charts how both are shaped by their experiences with sexual desire, subtly observing their behavior and, occasionally, the darker side of affection.

Guillaume commands much of the film’s attention. From the first shot, in which he stands on a desk in his all-boys boarding school and leads his mates in a barroom shanty, it’s obvious that Guillaume is a charismatic class clown who knows how to force all eyes onto himself. Yet the teen can also be withdrawn and introverted, and his relationships with his friends and teachers are constantly in flux. His puckish behavior is often celebrated by classmates and even some teachers, like the sardonic Perrier (Paul Ahmarani), who in one class invites Guillaume to do his impersonation of him, which the teen performs with hilarious specificity and to the initial delight and then discomfort of the professor.

Wounded by the boy’s exposure of his flaws, Perrier subsequently singles out Guillaume for harassment, berating him without cause and even screaming at the kid over the slightest perceived transgression. Guillaume’s peers are less extreme, but the same kids who applaud his classroom antics are also quick to ignore him inside their shared dorms or in social situations, content to simply use him for amusement during class time.

Guillaume’s awkward relationship to others at the boarding school is exacerbated by his closeted sexuality, which isolates him from the heteronormative activities of his friends. In one scene, Lesage films the boy in slow motion as he wanders through a house party surrounded by boys and girls kissing, trying to fit in by cautiously snaking his arm around a girl, who casually shrugs him off as he keeps walking. Like much of Genesis, the moment is at once thematically obvious and beautifully moving, with the sudden swell of morose pop transforming the scene into a lyrically intense expression of the boy’s sentimental education. The impeccable blocking places the other kids in every square inch of the room save for a pocket of dead space around Guillaume, poignantly emphasizing his loneliness.

Charlotte, by contrast, seems to have an easier time of things. More carefree and confident than her brother, she’s at first hampered only by her inane boyfriend, Maxime (Pier-Luc Funk), who broaches the subject of an open relationship with a forced sense of casual suggestion, only to later sobbingly backtrack after she kicks him to the curb. Charlotte ends up with the older Theo (Maxime Dumontier), whose charming demeanor and respectfulness suggests actual maturity. When Lesage films Charlotte in a club using the same slow-mo style that he did for Guillaume’s glum traipse through the house party, the tone is considerably brighter, with the young woman free and ebullient about her contentment.

Soon, however, Charlotte must also contend with the fallout of various sexual stresses. Lesage grapples with matters that are all too common to darker coming-of-age stories, and he captures the film’s most harrowing scenes in single takes. Yet if the filmmaker doesn’t shy away from plainly depicting such horrors as sexual violation, he avoids wallowing in the misery he piles onto his characters. Guillaume and especially Charlotte suffer, but Lesage pulls focus onto the aftershocks of trauma rather than the traumatic events themselves. Sometimes Genesis even ducks reinforcing the bleakest of expectations, as in a scene of Guillaume baring his soul to his classmates that ends in a surprisingly warm fashion.

Indeed, the bright colors and sedate direction of Genesis isn’t an ironic contrast for the difficult content within but a cue for the perseverance of hope in trying times. That optimism is borne out in the final act, which shifts focus to Felix (Édouard Tremblay-Grenier), the protagonist of The Demons, now a cheery teen attending what appears to be a bible camp. As he plays guitar with counselors and plays around in camp, he gravitates toward Beatrice (Émilie Bierre), a young girl who’s clearly as interested in him as he is in her. Compared to the more vicious heartbreak facing Charlotte and Guillaume, Felix and Beatrice’s budding feelings are presented innocently and sweetly. Their first flirtations end the film on a hopeful note that suggests that not all stories of young self-discovery need be solemn, and that we submit ourselves to the perils of affection because of its outweighing graces.

Cast: Théodore Pellerin, Noée Abita, Édouard Tremblay-Grenier, Maxime Dumontier, Jules Roy Scicotte, Pier-Luc Funk, Paul Ahmarani, Antoine Marchand-Gagnon, Émilie Bierre Director: Philippe Lesage Screenwriter: Philippe Lesage Running Time: 130 min Rating: NR Year: 2019

Continue Reading

Film

Review: Dragged Across Concrete Is an Uncanny Shot of Pulp Fiction

With his latest, S. Craig Zahler doubles down on the best and worst elements of the pulp film.

3.5

Published

on

Dragged Across Concrete
Photo: Summit Entertainment

With Bone Tomahawk, Brawl in Cell Block 99, and now Dragged Across Concrete, writer-director S. Craig Zahler has refined a highly particular style of pulp that runs both hot and cold. The tone is communicated up front by the films’ titles, which are garish and plainspoken, as if to say that operatically bad shit happens as a matter of course.

That’s the attitude that Zahler’s characters adopt as well, as they tend to face atrocity with the air of people who derive their strength from low expectations. Violence erupts in Zahler’s films with an offhand suddenness that’s often authentically shocking, which is heightened by a variety of formalist contradictions. Zahler pays intricate attention to deliberately crummy, vague, “universal” settings, and invests stereotypical characters with behavioral curlicues that render them just human enough so that their deaths sting. Zahler’s scenarios are deliberately absurd, yet he pumps them up with all sorts of odd, nearly docudramatic details, and this mixture of the banal and the hyper-specific imbues his films with an element of the uncanny.

Following a bruiser as he killed his way toward the inner sanctum of a surreally hellish prison, Brawl in Cell Block 99 was pointedly unpolitical—implying, in a macho manner typical of revenge films—that politics are a luxury for those who’re insulated from the “real world” of killed-or-be-killed. Which is to say that this apolitical texture is actually reactionary, suggesting, via omission, the essential futility of liberal humanist ideals. Dragged Across Concrete renders this idea much more explicit. The film’s theme is articulated when the poor and multiple sclerosis-plagued Melanie Ridgeman (Laurie Holden) says that she’s as liberal as an ex-cop can be, and that she never thought she was racist until she moved into her current neighborhood, which is low-income and rife with juvenile delinquents of color, who’re shown, in a reductive scene, to harass Melanie’s daughter.

The various cops and criminals of Dragged Across Concrete, white as well as of color, take the fraudulence of liberal beliefs as a given, writing them off as fantasies indulged by a populace that’s prosperous enough to evade their ramifications. (This theme is in the air right now, also driving Jordan Peele’s Us.) The film’s plot kicks into gear when Melanie’s husband, Detective Brett Ridgeman (Mel Gibson), and his partner, Anthony Lurasetti (Vince Vaughn), are suspended for exerting excessive force while arresting a Hispanic drug dealer, which a civilian films on a phone. Zahler acknowledges the detectives’ cruelty, while, per the dictates of the crime genre, also allowing us to revel in their bitterness and power.

This have-it-both-ways quality is another of Zahler’s provocations, as he’s explicitly saying that we come to these sorts of films to see the rough and cathartic exertion of force, and in spite of whether we think that force jibes with our real-world ideals. Zahler is right. The cruelty of his films, which is laced with a biting wit, has a way of clearing pop-cultural air that’s often inhabited by preachy think pieces and well-meaning Oscar bait, or even by genre films that nevertheless feel the need to solicit approval via a redemptive theme. Zahler heads for the gutter instead, asking us to empathize with characters who refute our idealisms.

After subduing the drug dealer, Ridgeman torments the dealer’s sexual partner, Rosalinda (Liannet Borrego), by showering her with cold water and forcing her to stand in a bedroom in her underwear while they question her. This footage isn’t filmed by other parties, so the extent of Ridgeman and Tony’s vigilante tactics are unknown by the public, prompting us to wonder what else they’ve gotten away with over the years. Yet they feel cheated for being suspended—feelings which their superior, Lt. Calvert (Don Johnson), casually shares. Such scenes elucidate the thorny specificity of Zahler’s vision while deliberately screwing with our moral compass. Ridgeman and Tony’s treatment of Rosalinda is disgusting and Zahler sensitively dramatizes her humiliation. So are the racist jokes the cops exchange with Calvert, though the actors’ performances and Zahler’s dialogue and staging are kinetically snappy. Zahler recreates that discombobulating split in sympathies you may have when someone you like says they voted for Trump, or rues the days of comparatively less fettered police brutality.

Yet there’s also a sense that Zahler is outside of Ridgeman and Tony’s self-pity; one suspects that politics mostly matter to the filmmaker in terms of aesthetic. If he’s nostalgic for the good old days, presumably before our culture grew so “politically correct,” that nostalgia is primarily directed toward genre films. Zahler is fighting for art’s right to be offensive and disreputable, voicing sentiments that are shared by many people in this country which cannot, and should not, be aired without scrutiny. He grooves on straight talk, however nasty, fashioning crime thrillers that force even liberal audiences to confront their inner fascists.

Zahler particularly appears to miss the days when violent Mel Gibson vehicles were relevant, and he concocts a role for Gibson that weds the actor’s own prejudices and controversies with his masochistic “Mad Mel” persona—two sides that were always closely intertwined anyway. Gibson rises to the occasion with a tightly coiled performance that’s so unapologetically closed-off that it’s deeply and disturbingly poignant, bringing to mind the conflicted range of emotions that’s elicited by John Wayne’s performance in The Searchers. Ridgeman’s feelings of being put out to pasture are aligned with Gibson’s stint in movie jail after recordings of his abusive rants at his wife were released. It’s no accidental coincidence that recordings destroy Ridgeman not once but twice over the course of Dragged Across Concrete.

Ridgeman is the film’s central avatar of rage—an embodiment of working-class American discontent that Zahler reveals to be shared by characters of varying colors, genders, and social statuses, most notably Henry (Tory Kittles), an African-American ex-con with limited options, with whom Ridgeman forges an uneasy alliance. Tellingly, given the aversion of Dragged Across Concrete to left-wing politeness, their emotional epiphany springs from their mutual willingness to call one another, and to each be called, the n-word.

Zahler takes a standard action-movie scenario—in which crooked cops try to rob drug dealers—and stretches it out to an epic, ultraviolent, and comic study of the petty, often working-class-centric nonsense that stymies people on a daily basis. When Henry rousts his mother’s john out of the house, Zahler lingers on the man as he fumbles with the locks on the door. Following Ridgeman and Tony as they tail a requisitely heartless Eurotrash killer, Vogelmann (Thomas Kretschmann), Zahler fashions an elaborate and ingenious set piece that alternates between two cars’ worth of men talking strategy. When a struggling mother, Kelly (Jennifer Carpenter), returns to work at a bank after a prolonged maternal leave, Zahler devotes a lengthy, weirdly touching and funny moment to the speech her verbose boss, Mr. Edmington (Fred Melamed), gives for the occasion. And this scene only intensifies the pain of what follows, which Zahler foreshadows with a masterful composition where we see a van of killers pass Kelly in the reflection of a window as she checks her make-up.

Dragged Across Concrete is a lurid ode to detail—to the professionalism that Zahler questionably admires in Ridgeman and Tony. (His lack of sentimentality, in the tradition of pulp writing, is ironically quite sentimental.) The film’s settings, like those of Brawl in Cell Block 99, are drab and anonymous, though Zahler shoots them with an exhilaratingly pared-down sense of purpose, with sharp physical details that complement the unexpected narrative flourishes. These backdrops suggest every place and no place at once, and are rendered with hard lighting and symmetrical framing that recalls the glory days of John Carpenter. The film’s dialogue is terse, intelligent, yet often somehow un-showy, suggesting the flip and funny things people often say while at work, which are rarely captured in cinema. These qualities cohabitate with a deliberately nasty vision of America—a union that Zahler embraces for its intense and suggestive social tension. He’s already a master of the pulp film, and with Dragged Across Concrete he doubles down on its best and worst elements.

Cast: Mel Gibson, Vince Vaughn, Tory Kittles, Jennifer Carpenter, Michael Jai White, Laurie Holden, Don Johnson, Udo Kier, Thomas Kretschmann, Liannet Borrego, Justine Warrington, Fred Melamed Director: S. Craig Zahler Screenwriter: S. Craig Zahler Distributor: Summit Entertainment Running Time: 162 min Rating: R Year: 2018

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Donate

Slant is reaching more readers than ever, but as online advertising continues to evolve, independently operated publications like ours have struggled to adapt. We're committed to keeping our content free and accessible—meaning no paywalls or subscription fees—so if you like what we do, please consider becoming a Slant patron:

Patreon

You can also make a donation via PayPal.

Giveaways

Advertisement

Newsletter

Advertisement

Preview

Trending