FILM
MOVIE REVIEW
28 Weeks Later ***
by Jeremiah Kipp on May 9, 2007 Jump to Comments (1) or Add Your Own
Basically, we're all fucked and there's no hope. 28 Weeks Later rolls in like a poisonous dust cloud of nihilism. The everyman hero this time around is Don (Robert Carlyle), who thinks he and his wife (Catherine McCormack) are safe in their wee rural cottage when the rage virus transforms most of mainland Britain into shrieking, blood-vomiting zombies that sprint head-on at their victims. The opening sequence shows how wrong Don is, and in a moment of panic he leaves his loved ones behind and races toward his own self-preservation. Perfectly cast in the role, Carlyle looks wizened and exhausted, hair graying at the temples and mouth grimacing in fear, as he races across a green field chased by a legion of monsters. The camera swoops above him across the field, and we're plunged into the realm of nightmare. Step after step, pushing himself past the point of weariness, Carlyle takes one last look behind him as his wife is ripped away from the window by the infected. Already, this prologue sets a tone of unrelenting apocalyptic doom.
That doesn't improve any when the American military shows up—28 weeks later. They smugly declare that the war against the infection has been won, and everything is under control. Don is reunited with his children, who were vacationing in Spain during the outbreak, and struggles to answer difficult questions about "what happened to Mum." Things seem fine for a while, and the Yankee infantry is so bored by the country's reconstruction that they pass the time gazing through the scopes of their sniper rifles past the windows of survivors. And, sure enough, it isn't long before a new outbreak runs rampant throughout the swarms of refugees who survived the previous outbreak. To add to the demoralizing unfairness of it all, they're also getting shot at and blowtorched by the Americans, who quickly reach "code red" status and start firebombing entire city blocks and setting off other biological weapons to prevent further infection.
28 Days Later was a tough and uncompromising horror film, but it's all sunshine and laughter in comparison to the sequel. The thesis of this film is that the War on Terror is ultimately a self-destructive one for all concerned, from the bullying authority figures to the demoralized combat soldiers to the fractured family units. Director Juan Carlos Fresnadillo seems to place his empathy with the recently infected. Much like Philip Kaufman's remake of Invasion of the Body Snatchers, there's an understanding for what it means to be human—and the magic that is lost when that humanity is stripped away. As if giving the middle finger to Steven Spielberg's cop-out ending to The War of the Worlds, this one sets up sympathetic characters (where even Don's guilt-inducing cowardice is represented as chillingly understandable under the circumstances) only to absolutely decimate them whenever it feels like it, unfairly and often in horrible and unfair ways. (Most might single out Don as the "Janet Leigh" character of 28 Weeks Later, but don't start guessing, because this one is a highly unpredictable version of the game "characters that don't die in the order you expect.")
The brooding, hard-driving score by John Murphy, with some memorable tracks repeated from 28 Days Later, grinds itself into your brain, inducing maximum paranoia as the survivors make their fight-or-flight out of the city. And the image quality is still rough around the edges, with roving handheld shots stalking the characters (or, more often, racing along with them). But Fresnadillo attempts to move beyond the scrappy digital video original, adopting an epic scope, with empty cities forming into haunted canyons. That opening shot of Carlyle running across the field is representative of how much larger the scope is on 28 Weeks Later. A bigger budget equals bigger explosions and more infected zombies roaming about, but what I like so much about Carlyle's run is how it emphasizes his smallness in the face of looming disaster. Brace yourself, kids, because the movie never wavers from that theme. Running at a taut 99 minutes that seem to go by in the blink of an eye, the only question is whether 28 Weeks Later will pull its climactic punch to reaffirm the previous film's optimistic statement that "not everything's fucked."
- Director(s): Juan Carlos Fresnadillo
- Screenplay: Juan Carlos Fresnadillo, Rowan Joffe, E.L. Lavigne, Jesus Olmo
- Cast: Robert Carlyle, Rose Byrne, Jeremy Renner, Harold Perrineau, Catherine McCormack, Imogen Poots, Mackintosh Muggleton, Idris Elba
- Distributor: Fox Atomic
- Runtime: 99 min.
- Rating: R
- Year: 2007
Comments
- No-Personality on January 17, 2012, 04:44 AM
-
I am deeply offended that this movie series became one to begin with. I admit I haven't seen this sequel yet, but the idea that it in any way is driven by "fear" of the weakest element in the original movie and something I think only paid off at the very end of Days (ha), is ludicrous and kinda pisses in the face of what really made the original work: the characters (making it a rarity for its time since, thanks to Blair Witch Project's lowest of lows, characters had begun to be defined by how many "fuck"s they uttered). I assume none of the original characters reappear for Weeks and that would be for the better since their story was resolved as best it could have been back there. I'm the first person to tell you I understand that the world is doomed. In reality. But why is it that which propels a movie like Days to beget a sequel? Damn if it doesn't feel like a studio decision more than one by a serious filmmaker.
It's very much like someone is saying that first film didn't do its' job right. Hence again why I'm offended. Since I took that film very seriously (and defended it through a sea of fanboy bitching that it was any kind of rip-off of Romero's Dawn - superior, I know - and Day - inferior, I think), took the time to buy it even though visually the image of people running around like demented football players is not my idea of terror (and also I imagine is what constitutes terror in this sequel- "people are scared of these ragies so we have to give 'em MORE!"), and allowed it to finally dig itself into me. It really did take care of so many future themes of aughts horror far better than the shitload of further infection, survival, violation, and revenge films to come after. Jim's capture and degradation at the hands of the soldiers not only visually negated the need for anything like Frontier(s) (as did Hostel) but had me so invested emotionally (thank the film for knowing how to write and present characters you care about REALLY well) that I just shake my head at the endless praise Martyrs has received. More extreme violence doesn't necessarily make a stronger point. Yet, a cultural thirst (I'll agree that far with Eric) for the illusion of extremity and "more running zombies" (or "infected" living people with far greater strength than ordinary humans- even describing these plots makes me feel patronized) brings us yet more crap we don't need.
Though I will admit, I'm allowing myself to be biased by the very existence of any incarnation of something like Quarantine. Which blame can almost be placed entirely on this film's success. I had a far more terrifying experience just watching Phelan Porteous's video review of that film - even though it was utterly hilarious - because it made its' success all the more baffling. Did people lose their collective minds or something? Even Rob Humanick's 2 star rating was extraordinarily kind. (Though IMDb currently has it barely skating by with a 6.0 out of 10 rating, all is not right with the world- that is still MUCH too high.) Maybe the world is in deep shit, but does that mean we should be supporting films we don't need? Isn't that kinda pretentious? (Though I'm not saying Kipp is to blame for that- who could have known a sequel would lead to such a huge boom of rip-offs?) I will make an endeavor to see this sequel because I very much respect Mr. Kipp (although he said one almost anti-Canadian thing once that kinda bothered me; I'm an American baffled by all the cheapshots at that nation). But I don't want to find out this movie exists to be a form of exercise for people who never get off their asses.
Add Your Own
Most Popular
- The 25 Best Films of 2011
- The Dictator
- Dark Shadows
- Battleship
- Hick
- Interview: James Franco
- Moonrise Kingdom
- What to Expect When You're Expecting
- The Avengers
- Lovely Molly




