FILM
LIST
The 25 Best Films of 2011
by Slant Staff on December 15, 2011 Jump to Comments (19) or Add Your Own

20. Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy. The best episode of Mad Men never made, Tomas Alfredson's smoke-and-beige-lacquered film of John Le Carre's 1974 novel doesn't just focus on Well-Dressed Overgrown Boys, it also locates much of the same sense of proportion, and down-is-up layering of priorities, that underwrites the belief structure of each world. Me before you, ego before country, secrecy before loyalty, bureaucracy and shitty vindictiveness above all. In a deliciously rendered husk of post-imperial Great Britain, Alfredson performs the miracle of transforming Le Carre's prose—aggressively obfuscatory when it's not quietly purple—into a tapestry of fragments, half-heard conversations, and indelible details. Almost every actor in Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy is cast against type (Gary Oldman the church mouse, Tom Hardy a mop-topped ragamuffin, Mark Strong a largely decent fellow with a slight case of soul-sickness), but nobody is denied their moment in the sun. Jaime N. Christley

19. Meek's Cutoff. After stripping and reassembling the male-bonding journey movie with Old Joy and the neo-realist weepie with Wendy and Lucy, Kelly Reichardt set her sights this year on the western, perhaps the hoariest and most loaded of American genres. In Meek's Cutoff, her barebones approach is impressively realistic, imagining a cross-country journey through arid, featureless Eastern Oregon as an exercise in numbing frustration, an approach that more importantly lays the groundwork for the film's core gender conflict. Preserving the mystical status of the Old West as a place for allegorical fables and origin stories, she shapes this dusty journey into a parable of feminist agency. The westbound wagons of Meek's Cutoff represent not only the creeping vines of a still-growing nation, but the occasion for one woman's development, as Emily Tetherow (Michelle Williams) progresses from dissatisfied frontier wife to rifle-wielding voice of reason, a welcome corrective to decades of decisive, bravely trailblazing male heroes. Jesse Cataldo

18. Leap Year. The perversions that take shape when nobody is watching pervades Leap Year, Michael Rowe's perfectly concise film about an ordinary woman (Monica del Carmen) alone in her apartment in Mexico City. She spends her time eating canned noodles, picking her nose, staring at the walls or at the neighbors, sometimes masturbating to their most banal gestures of intimacy, and, most symptomatically, having sex with strangers who always leave too soon. The rituals, the repetitions, the horror of solitude, as well as the ridiculous fantasies that it harbors—she could be Jeanne Dielman if she charged for her body, or a New Yorker with a Craigslist account. Del Carmen's realistic portrayal of a seemingly ordinary woman with supposedly extraordinary needs exposes the massive chasm between the performance of everyday life and the existential agony that underpins it. Leap Year is also an astute rumination on Latin American temporality and kinship. Here, time is tracked by whether or not one has already had lunch or dinner, and the family both haunts and suffocates even when, or especially when, it's the least physically present. Diego Costa

17. A Dangerous Method. For all the repression and freaky sexuality and obsession and caning Keira Knightly across the ass, A Dangerous Method might be David Cronenberg's sunniest take on the question of "the new flesh" in all the 40-odd years he's been contemplating it. Mildly heartbreaking that it should also seem to look forward to two World Wars. It's also the case that Cronenberg hijacks very proper and very dry prestige material and, in the very act of giving said material the deluxe, clean-lined, hi-fi treatment, finds what may be Patient Zero of all the perversions and blasphemies to come, right in the fabric of the film. It begins with Michael Fassbender's faithful husband and good doctor Carl Jung applying the "talking cure" to Knightley’s hysterical Sabina Spielrein, who seems beyond help. With perverse precision and spotless period detail, Cronenberg performs the talking cure on his own film at the same time as Jung performs his, unraveling and redeeming the 20th century even as it's only getting just started. Jaime N. Christley

16. El Sicario, Room 164. El Sicario, Room 164, one of the most revealing and shocking documentaries ever made about the drug trade, is mostly a series of fixed shots of a masked man talking to a camera. The sicario's story is a familiar, eerily three-act rise-and-fall crime saga: A young poor child is seduced by a Mexican's cartel's vast power and gradually evolves from performing petty errands and crimes to kidnapping and torturing people for maddeningly vague reasons. Eventually tiring of the lifestyle's accompanying drug abuse and alcoholism, the assassin becomes a pariah in danger of winding up on the wrong end of a gun himself. There are haunting, inventive touches that quietly speak to the matter-of-factness of his dehumanization: The former killer sketches accompanying images on a pad while talking, and he occasionally rises from his chair to pantomime some of his more outrageous acts. These simple gestures, which speak of the effectiveness of elegantly pared filmmaking, suggest a truth, and a disturbing empathy, that more enraged, self-righteous documentaries rarely manage: the terrifyingly casual roots of evil. Chuck Bowen

15. Beginners. The past—familial, historical, collective—haunts the contemporary in Mike Mills's beautifully modulated, crystal-eyed Beginners, a relationship drama that employs a fractured flashback structure to precisely situate the present. Built around a trio of superb performances, Mills's film details Oliver Fields's (Ewan McGregor) inability to commit to girlfriend Anna (Mélanie Laurent) because of the tensions in his own parents' marriage, largely the result of his father's (Christopher Plummer) gayness. But the film is concerned with far more than this somewhat reductive psychology; it's about the precision of individual experience , which Mills evokes with astonishing exactitude, whether detailing the elder Fields's late-life involvement in the Los Angeles gay community or in constructing wonderfully offbeat scenes, as when Oliver dons a Sigmund Freud costume (and persona) for a party. Beyond its understanding of individual interactions, though, Beginners views its characters as players in a shifting socio-historical drama, one in which familial roles and concepts of queerness evolve and define the life of a country and its citizens. The series of contextualizing voiceover montages that Mills concocts—melancholic snapshots of different eras—not only entwine the personal and political, but get at the raw heart of lives lived under the shadow of the past, poised for new beginnings. Andrew Schenker

14. Tomboy. What's in a name? A kindred spirit of Andre Téchiné, Céline Sciamma is an astute chronicler of difficult emotional terrain and a subtle explorer of young people's bourgeoning sexual identity. Tomboy, a work of almost bucolic serenity filled with poignant glimpses of the bonds of sisterhood, begins with prepubescent Laure (Zoé Héran) bathed in the Edenic glow of family, a force so mesmeric as to convince anyone of feeling invincible to pain and heartache. And so, after moving to a new town with her parents and sister, a cherubic little thing ostracized by her youth from the very world her older sis seeks to belong to, the sensitive Laure, confused for a boy by a neighbor girl who might not want her if she knew Laure was developing breasts of her own, introduces herself as Michaël. What follows is a tense, impeccably detailed study of all the lies, compromises, and secret negotiations that must take place for Laure to maintain the illusion of belonging to a world dominated by the games forbidden to girls by boys. Ed Gonzalez

13. In the Family. This year saw the release of many impressive debut films, but they all feel weightless compared to Patrick Wang's ambitious, compassionate, and devastating three-hour masterpiece. The story may seem small and contained on the surface: interior designer Joey (Wang) loses his partner Cody (Trevor St. John) in a car accident, which upends his paternal relationship with Cody's young son and isolates him further from a surrogate family who were once so close. But there's nothing minor about the brilliant way In the Family handles regional identity and societal contradictions, themes that are explored during dialogue-driven set pieces where humility and understanding can be found in every pause. With an Ozu-like attention to detail and silence, Wang establishes a palpable sincerity toward Joey's disintegrating sense of family that never trivializes or moralizes his suffering or scorn. Instead, the film values conversation, the impact of waiting, and the power of optimism. Unlike most sentimental Hollywood schmaltz, In the Family earns its tears by spending long amounts of time with characters we care about, those who speak to each other and not at each other. Most notably, in Wang we have found a major talent, a chronicler of complex emotional collisions and reflections who expresses himself profoundly without resorting to theatrics. Glenn Heath Jr.

12. Film Socialisme. Manny Farber wrote over 40 years ago that no filmmaker matched Jean-Luc Godard in making him feel like an ass. Farber is gone, but Godard, now past 80, continued to intimidate and divide with this latest provocation, a video essay that, particularly in light of world events since its debut, seems inescapably about the end of Europe as we've known it. Its first half full of rich metaphorical fun aboard a cruise ship tooling around the Mediterranean, Film Socialisme's technical palette encompasses stunning HD frames of churning surf and low-grade phone cam to capture neon-lit dancing and drinking, as shadowy characters and a narrator ponder the history of Egypt, Palestine, Odessa, Greece, Naples, and Barcelona. On dry land, a family operating a gas station is embroiled in politics and media attention, though it's hard to say for certain why a llama and a mule are tethered to the tanks out front, since Godard supplied only "Navajo subtitles" running an average of three words to translate the English-language release. Repeated viewings figure to enlighten, flummox, and assify contemporary Farbers, but Godard's cryptic travelogue through the past is ambitious and elegiac enough to ponder for the rest of this epoch. Bill Weber

11. Take Shelter. Much has been made of the very last scene in writer-director Jeff Nichols's powerhouse follow-up to Shotgun Stories. But if this confusing and mostly negligible ending were more important, it wouldn't be the film's coda. Take Shelter is more of a study of the fractured psyche of blue-collar family man Curtis (a more-haunted-than-usual Michael Shannon) than it is about the apocalyptic visions that he's afflicted with. The puissance of the trauma that he experiences is more important than whether or not these nightmarish daydreams actually mean something. Suggesting Hour of the Wolf set in heartland America, Take Shelter is about the working-class Southern gothic milieu that engenders Curtis's hallucinations. It's also about how Curtis's problems immediately threaten his family. Jessica Chastain gives one of the year's best performances as Curtis's concerned wife and partner, and the scene where she and Shannon argue about whether or not they should open their cellar's storm doors is devastating. Simon Abrams
Page 2 of 3
Page: « prev  1 23 next »
Comments
- experimentofilm on December 15, 2011, 11:44 AM
-
Great top three. Especially nice to see the love for Mysteries of Lisbon.
- bandwagon on December 15, 2011, 03:12 PM
-
Some lovely stuff there. I lot of these slipped through the cracks—almost.
- acf171072 on December 15, 2011, 03:18 PM
-
Much as though there are some excellent films in this list, the isolationist attitude of American critics to only counting a film when it shows cinematically there rears its uglt head. I wonder does da Vinci's Mona Lisa not exist because it's never left the Louvre (expect in robbery attempts)?
A Brighter Summer Day is a 1991 film. It has always been so. Just because it never showed cinemnatically in the US until then is immaterial. Battleship Potemkin wasn't shown publicly in the UK until 1961, does that mean it was counted it as a 1961 film? Er, no.
Likewise, while one can perhaps forgive a one year delay on seeing films to include 2010 films as this is common practice, anything more than this is pure laziness on the part of the critic. Part of a critics' job should be being aware of films long before they come to the US, seeking them out at film festivals and promoting them, not when they come to their own doorstep. In many ways, good word of mouth is the only way in our garbage saturated film market they will ever get attention. Many European critics list films seen at Film Festivals nut not given full releases, maybe one day the US will grow up and recognise there are cinemas elsewhere.
Extraordinary Stories for example is a great film, anout this you are right. But it was 2008, for gawd's sake. It's yesterday's news. If we film fans who aren't paid to have opinions can seek these films out in our spare time around 9-5 job, you—and it's obviously even more aimed at so-called professional film critics in the big cities like New York who never even cross the Hudson let alone the Atlantic to catch a film—should be able to.
It's sad, because a generally fine list is fatally compromised. As the previous commenter put, it's great to see Mysteries of Lisbon there, even if only the cinema version. Great to see a couple of others on there, too. But make the list better by having real 2011 entries not yet seen on there and make people salivate to see them when they DO come to the US.
- Archer on December 15, 2011, 05:57 PM
-
I'm currently weeping semen tears over the exclusion of "House of Pleasures". Otherwise, great list!
- Jaime N. Christley on December 16, 2011, 07:42 AM
-
What Ed said—
I understand what acf171072 is trying to say but if you are serious about lists you have to allow that different criteria apply under different sets of circumstances: two sets, to be precise.
If you were to take the "year of US release" to its logical conclusion, you'd have to say THE RULES OF THE GAME is a 1950 film. Okay then, so don't take "year of US release" to it's logical conclusion. Okay. But if you were a critic back in 1950 and miraculously you had the internet back then and critics (largely freelance, unpaid, etc) were list-crazy and had the opportunity to stump for a movie that didn't get a proper release until that year, well then you hope people will join you in making some noise for THE RULES OF THE GAME.
I have a page that lists all my favorite films, from 2011 all the way back to the 1910s and beyond, and I use the IMDb year as the gold standard. What's really lovely is that, almost every day, the "official" year of at least one of those movies is altered by IMDb contributors who find evidence that such-and-such was actually released in 1959, or 1961, etc. If anyone wants to be the watchdog for that, be my guest. Why even now someone got it into their head that BLOOD OF A POET is a 1932 film, because that's when it had its Paris world premiere. To give you an idea of how *insane* this can get.
When awards/list season gets too heavy, you see writers standing back and saying things like "Well, all these lists are worthless, anyway, there's no objective value, etc." Well, ha ha, okay, sure. Except not quite—it's true that it isn't science, but (a) consider who made the list, not everyone's opinion is created equally, and (b) if the list circus is a form of play, it's play within a certain set of guidelines, not free-for-all, run-screaming-across-the-blacktop play. And hey, the rules let you stump for ARMY OF SHADOWS in 2006—sweet!
Finally, a US release isn't nothing. It makes a title the film critic version of news, so that it can be reported as an event. A paper like the New York Times will run a piece on it even if they have to send out a 14-year-old copy boy to catch a 2 AM showing in order to do so. While a few of us are very much aware that A BRIGHTER SUMMER DAY is a landmark film, US release or not, it's simply not possible to rally the US critical mass around any movie until it passes a certain threshold.
- kylef on December 17, 2011, 04:18 PM
-
A lovely list! Only thing I would point out is that you list Sean Penn in TREE OF LIFE as Sean Pitt. Just a heads up on the slight slip.
- Jack Pig on December 18, 2011, 12:56 PM
-
Though this is among the better lists I've seen, where's Fast Five? Even within its genre limitations, the quality and variety of sensations it manages to provide as well the superb execution of its narrative keep it well in the upper ranks of films released during the year. I fail to see how anyone who watches film for the kinds of experiences the medium can uniquely provide could consistently overlook it in favor of delusively-intellectual movies lacking the most rudimentary craftsmanship and ordering, as if a film's value derives not from what it is, but how facilely it serves as a platform for obscure blathering on thematics, anything but a broad aesthetic appreciation that implicitly considers formalistic and other concerns in its purview. Hence anything with perceived gravitas (be it via theme, mood, tone, pace or lack thereof) is automatically deemed good cinema, no matter how ineptly formed per film logic as opposed to through these desperately discursive goggles. I see so many people willing to pardon a filmmaker's utter failure to maintain a thoroughgoing authorial control over a film's structure, coherences, meanings, sensations, to the point of excusing harebrained philosophizing (much of The Tree of Life, which admittedly had incredible cinematography and the best scene of the year - Lacrimosa) and extreme dullness (say, the latter half of Melancholia) if the merest allusions and context exist amenable to initiate the common species of vapid "intellectual" discourse. I say this as someone whose favorite films are Tess, Pulp Fiction, The New World, Blue Velvet, Annie Hall, and Mulholland Dr.
- snarpo on December 18, 2011, 02:28 PM
-
Wow. I can't remember a year of Slant's top 25 where I went "uh, huh?" more. Not that they're bad picks... I just have no idea what they are.
- Parker on December 19, 2011, 02:07 AM
-
Incredible list. I'm really glad Poetry made the cut. My love for that movie surprised me. Certified Copy is a masterpiece. I can't wait to see Mysteries of Lisbon.
- Justsaying on December 19, 2011, 08:25 AM
-
Re. Last sentence in the "Take Shelter" blurb — "...and the devastating scene where she and Shannon argue about whether or not they should open their cellar's storm doors is devastating." Double devastating, eh? No wonder the film made the list.
- ogqozo on December 19, 2011, 06:27 PM
-
Kinda sad not to see "Hearbeats" and "Le Quattro Volte" mentioned, movies I loved. Especially Heartbeats, as House Next Door has hosted some enthusiastic writing about the movie around its premiere. Well, among the voters, looks like no one was that enthusiastic.
- ogqozo on December 21, 2011, 03:48 PM
-
Cool. I could watch the movie every day, it has such simple but refreshing way of showing. I can't wait till I get a chance to see "Mysteries of Lisbon", "In the Family" and "Margaret", so far they remain unreleased in my country. I hope they are released on American or English DVD.
- mietzelfeld on December 28, 2011, 02:12 PM
-
no love for "weekend"? yikes.
- rashomon on December 30, 2011, 03:34 PM
-
I'm really not sure why someone is bothered by a 1991 film making the list. Part of the job of every critic is to turn people onto films they would normally never have heard of. Often that includes older films. And so if an older film finally gets a release in the US twenty years after the fact then it IS eligible to make a list. A film like A Brighter Summer Day can actually make two lists. Best of 1991 and best of 2011. It depends on what criteria is used. I prefer release - and thus available to see - dates rather than 'first seen in the world' dates. Let me quote words of wisdom from Lauren Bacall, 'It's not an old movie if you haven't seen it."
- glegs on December 31, 2011, 06:26 AM
-
I am surprised that "The Turin Horse" hasn't made it, I would have thought it would be a favorite. Is there a reason it isn't here?
- rashomon on January 1, 2012, 05:26 PM
-
glegs
"The Turin Horse" doesn't get an official release until 2012. In the comment by Ed Gonzales he notes they only consider films that get a one week release in the US in a calendar year. Which is standard for most critic lists. I'm sure it will make the next year-end list.
- deb on January 15, 2012, 10:13 AM
-
Excellent list! Two other films I would like to include are Mike Leigh's *another year* and Pablo Larrain's *post mortem*.
Add Your Own
Most Popular
- The 25 Best Horror Films of the Aughts
- The 25 Best Films of 2011
- Star Wars: Episode I - The Phantom Menace
- This Means War
- Ghost Rider: Spirit of Vengeance
- The Vow
- Bullhead
- The Secret World of Arrietty
- Safe House
- Michael



