The 25 Best Films of 2011

by Slant Staff on December 15, 2011   Jump to Comments (19) or Add Your Own


Poetry

10. Poetry . In Lee Chang-dong's Poetry, a forgetful grandmother (Yun Jung-hee) finds for the first time, at sixtysomething, pleasure beyond self-effacement in her attempt to craft a poem for a writing class. This is an endeavor judged by her acquaintances as either too futile or lofty for someone of her status: "You're taking a what class?" She seems undaunted in the search for inspiration even when her grandson, for whom she is the de facto mother, takes part in an unspeakable crime. Like Bon Joon-Ho's Mother, Poetry places the Korean mother as unconditional devotee to her offspring to the point of incestuous sacrifice. They build their diseases together. The son's heinous wrongdoing works in both films as pleas for proof of a maternal affection that's never articulated through speech—pleas that are promptly answered by mothers willing to do absolutely anything to save the child, especially if it will keep them from ever growing up. In Poetry, this wordless game is psychosomatized in the grandmother's Alzheimer's disease, but also recovered through a kind of linguistic redemption when she begins to give poetic license for apples, flowers, or a flaccid elderly penis, to be something other than themselves. Diego Costa

Nostalgia for the Light

9. Nostalgia for the Light. Celestial wonder and terrestrial atrocity make for instructive points of comparison in Chilean filmmaker Patricio Guzmán's probing, contrapuntal documentary. Set amid the Atacama Desert in the director's native country, the film follows two groups of searchers, the astronomers who take advantage of the distant locale's unique propensity to facilitate stargazing, and families of victims from former dictator Augusto Pinochet's regime who search for the remnants of their loved ones buried deep beneath the land's arid surface. The legacy of the post-Allende reign of terror has long been Guzmán's chosen subject, but here he contextualizes the era's brutality not historically, but philosophically, weaving a rich web of meditations on past and present, the corporeal and the spiritual, the infinite and the achingly human-scale. Although some of Nostalgia for the Light's compare-and-contrast juxtapositions seem a little too on the nose, this is a work of significant moral and intellectual power, a movie that celebrates humankind's relentless thirst for knowledge or closure—or really anything larger than itself—and regards that unquenchable need with both awe and a resigned weariness born of too much history. Andrew Schenker

Tuesday, After Christmas

8. Tuesday, After Christmas. I'm not going to lie to you and tell you that Radu Muntean's Scope-framed portrait of an imploding marriage moves at the breakneck pace of something like Asghar Farhadi's A Separation. Tuesday, After Christmas is constructed of a series of very, very long takes, and the actors play their scenes at what you might call "life speed," and there are no Martha Marcy May Marlene-esque violent outbursts that have you dreading the third act. But somehow, unbelievably, in the harmony that comes from the interplay between these two rhythms (glacial camera, uninflected day-to-day domestic life), Muntean's clear-eyed portrait of a family in trouble—in trouble, but, you know, getting on with their lives—exerts a palpable force on the viewer that makes one feel, for once in a year of concept this and concept that films, like you made an organic connection. Jaime N. Christley

Uncle Boonmee Who Can Recall His Past Lives

7. Uncle Boonmee Who Can Recall His Past Lives. Man's intrinsic relationship to animals and nature form the backbone of Apichatpong Weerasethakul's Uncle Boonmee Who Can Recall His Past Lives, a hazy, hallucinatory work about a bee farmer whose fatal tropical malady summons both the spirit of his dead son—who's mated with a red-eyed Ghost Monkey to become a furry creature himself—and the ghost of his deceased wife. Politicized notions of silence and guilt creep into the film's portrait of the past's influence on the present, and eventually come to the fore through a mesmerizing narrative blending of time and space. Building upon the filmmaker's favored thematic concerns, Weerasethakul's latest is defined by its directorial style, full of languorous cinematography and immersive sound design, which creates a hypnotic otherworldly mood of both horror and hope. Just as its characters are in a constant state of physical and spiritual evolution, so too does the film prove a small but stunning progression forward in Weerasethakul's hauntingly ethereal cinema. Nick Schager

Margaret

6. Margaret. In Margaret, the eyes have it. Kenneth Lonergan's follow-up to the infinitely more polite You Can Count on Me begins in tears, with a woman, horrifically run over by a bus and dying in the arms of young Lisa (spectacularly played by Anna Paquin), asking if her eyes are open, and ends with the teen and her mother (a resplendent J. Smith-Cameron) reaching for each over in mutual understanding across a river of tears. And seeing is believing what comes between Margaret's two operatic bookends: a two-and-a-half-hour snapshot of fear and loathing, conviction and compromise, longing and alienation, in post-9/11 New York City, presented through the point of a view of a teenage girl whose almost sadistic self-absorption is both agony and ecstasy. Bearing the battle scars of a contentious six-year journey from script to screen, Longergan's film maudit is all frayed nerves, every bit as messy, crazed, and alive with the promise and imagination of its main character. See them, for they may change the world. Ed Gonzalez

A Separation

5. A Separation . A Separation opens with a two-shot that quietly informs every other event that will soon transpire in the film. An Iranian couple, Simin (Leila Hatami) and Naader (Peyman Moaadi, in one of the year's best performances) are appealing to an unseen representative of a family court for a separation. Simin wants to leave the country with Naader and their daughter, but he refuses to leave his father, who's in the grips of advanced Alzheimer's. Simin pleads, baring her frustrations and resentments while Naader tries to conceal his confusion and heartbreak to retain a semblance of traditionally masculine dignity. The court representative, apparently immune to the squishy, gray, unquantifiable emotions of the matter, only speaks of cut-and-dried rules and formalities. Sitting side by side, we can tell by their looks and gestures that this couple is still very much in love, but they've reached a perhaps fatal impasse. To reveal much more would be unfair, but Asghar Farhadi's devastating and extraordinary film isn't a predictable swipe at an antiquated, chauvinistic regime, but a more complex and human exploration of the varying standards—social, sexual, political, monetary—that insidiously imprison all of us. Chuck Bowen

The Tree of Life

4. The Tree of Life. Terrence Malick returns to the beginning of everything with his latest magnum opus, a spellbinding work that spans eons and comingles the ancient, recent, and present as a means of addressing the writer-director's guiding preoccupation with the inexorable continuum of life. Throughout, the cosmic is the microcosmic, with The Tree of Life eventually wending its way from the Big Bang to the 1950s Waco, Texas home of the O'Briens (a not-so-subtle proxy for Malick's own clan) and, specifically, to young Jack (a remarkably candid Hunter McCracken) and his struggle to reconcile his tumultuous inner division between cold nature (represented by Brad Pitt's hard father) and loving grace (Jessica Chastain's angelic mother). Working in an elliptical manner that suggests James Joyce and William Faulkner, Malick dispenses with conventional narrative in favor of a free-floating poeticism that casts the material as shards of personal memories ripped from its maker's subconscious—recollections that, culminating on an otherworldly beach, seem to have been pieced together in a desperate attempt, embodied by sequences of Sean Penn as adult Jack, to achieve a measure of reconciliation, salvation, and transcendence. Nick Schager

Mysteries of Lisbon

3. Mysteries of Lisbon. Rarely does a cinematic experience swallow you whole, but Mysteries of Lisbon, maybe the closest any film has come to being an epic poem, does just that. Chilean director Raúl Ruiz, who passed away this year at the tender age of 70, injects his simmering passion play about hidden identities and repressed memories with a graceful kinetic rhythm, a sense of cyclical movement that allows an ornate 19th-century Portugal to become an ocean of unrequited love and tragedy. It's a densely layered filmic landscape where textured interiors and sublime natural light surround an array of diverse characters—orphans, priests, soldiers, pirates, aristocrats—torn between emotional duress and philosophical enlightenment. The film's demanding temporal and spatial aesthetic, captured by haunting long takes and overlapping audio, creates a narrative Rubik's cube that keeps turning and twisting until each character has been aligned with their necessary fate. Yet despite its four-hour running time and laundry list of shape-shifting players, Mysteries of Lisbon is a breezy cinematic dream, a film that effortlessly mixes grand ideas (national trauma, historiography) with small emotional truths, ultimately revealing how one can perfectly mirror the other. Glenn Heath Jr.

A Brighter Summer Day

2. A Brighter Summer Day. At last receiving an American release 20 years after its production, the late Edward Yang's drama of Taipei teenagers and their displaced mainland parents in the early 1960s is an austere, intensely emotional epic. Using only diegetic music (the sounds of Elvis and his western pop peers, heard on radio, phonograph, or covered with phonetic precision by idolatrous Taiwanese youths), it feels like Rebel Without a Cause or Cruel Story of Youth stripped of their lurid melodramatic filter, with gang violence and sexual awakenings viewed at an unromanticized, almost clinical distance, in the shadows of night, by flashlight or streetlamp. Its bursts of juvenile aggression are abrupt and messy (a brick to the head, a kick in the balls, wildly brandished swords) while the chief adult subplot, the unraveling of the central family's patriarch when the secret police grill him on past associates in Shanghai, climaxes with slow sadism in a spartan interrogation chamber. At nearly four hours, Yang's evocation of the time and place of his adolescence never plods, but lingers sadly over the gaps between home and exile, desire and madness. Bill Weber

Certified Copy

1. Certified Copy. The year's most subtly intriguing cinematic puzzle is also its best film, a roaming two-hander that's by turns haunting, confounding, uplifting, and sad. Unnamed art-dealer She (Juliette Binoche) and visiting author James Miller (William Shimmell) wander through the streets of a rustic Italian village, encountering presumptuous baristas, sacred shrines, and hordes of hopeful brides, who blow into the frame like gusts of windblown flowers. Under the guiding hand of an eminent humanist like Abbas Kiarostami, what's essentially a rambling argument between two often-unlikable people turns into an extended examination of authenticity and imitation, expanding its characters' love for copies from art to architecture to humanity itself, an open tap endlessly spewing reproductions of itself. Less formally explosive than The Tree of Life, Certified Copy nevertheless solidifies Kiarostami's reputation as an international director, capable of porting his usual wistful themes and rigorous style onto a modern European setting, telling a story that's achingly specific but also beautifully universal. Jesse Cataldo

Page 3 of 3

Page:  «  prev  1 2 3




Comments

experimentofilm on December 15, 2011, 11:44 AM

Great top three. Especially nice to see the love for Mysteries of Lisbon.

bandwagon on December 15, 2011, 03:12 PM

Some lovely stuff there. I lot of these slipped through the cracks—almost.

acf171072 on December 15, 2011, 03:18 PM

Much as though there are some excellent films in this list, the isolationist attitude of American critics to only counting a film when it shows cinematically there rears its uglt head. I wonder does da Vinci's Mona Lisa not exist because it's never left the Louvre (expect in robbery attempts)?

A Brighter Summer Day is a 1991 film. It has always been so. Just because it never showed cinemnatically in the US until then is immaterial. Battleship Potemkin wasn't shown publicly in the UK until 1961, does that mean it was counted it as a 1961 film? Er, no.

Likewise, while one can perhaps forgive a one year delay on seeing films to include 2010 films as this is common practice, anything more than this is pure laziness on the part of the critic. Part of a critics' job should be being aware of films long before they come to the US, seeking them out at film festivals and promoting them, not when they come to their own doorstep. In many ways, good word of mouth is the only way in our garbage saturated film market they will ever get attention. Many European critics list films seen at Film Festivals nut not given full releases, maybe one day the US will grow up and recognise there are cinemas elsewhere.

Extraordinary Stories for example is a great film, anout this you are right. But it was 2008, for gawd's sake. It's yesterday's news. If we film fans who aren't paid to have opinions can seek these films out in our spare time around 9-5 job, you—and it's obviously even more aimed at so-called professional film critics in the big cities like New York who never even cross the Hudson let alone the Atlantic to catch a film—should be able to.

It's sad, because a generally fine list is fatally compromised. As the previous commenter put, it's great to see Mysteries of Lisbon there, even if only the cinema version. Great to see a couple of others on there, too. But make the list better by having real 2011 entries not yet seen on there and make people salivate to see them when they DO come to the US.

Ed Gonzalez on December 15, 2011, 03:55 PM

acf171072: I'm not sure how much you think we make, but if a film isn't coming to the New York City area, as a theatrical release or film-festival selection, where our broke asses can see them, then it's not going to get written about. The rules for inclusion (a one-week release in the United States during the calendar year) are the same for this list as they are for most critics polls, from the Village Voice's to Film Comment's, and they exist for a reason: to level the playing field. We'll make you a promise: When we have the Hollywood Reporter's budget, and we can send all our contributors to Cannes, Venice, Tokyo, and beyond, we'll change the rules. Also, you will find us on the film-festival beat all the time, championing films and as such helping to push them a little closer toward the possibility of U.S. distribution, so I certainly don't need a lecture on how to spread word of mouth. I also don't need to be told what year "Brighter Summer Day" belongs to (that's what iMDB is for). It seems that every year, when a Killer of Sheep finally gets its day in the sun, us critics who include such a film on their Top 10s have to defend the inclusion. Some of our writers did not vote for this film (which, by the way, I wrote about long ago, and included in our 100 Essential Films feature) out of principle, while others did so understanding that in 1991, when few Americans, not just critics, had ever heard of the film, or thought they would ever get to see it, it stood no chance of getting the representation it deserved. Now that we have all been gifted with the chance of seeing the film, on a big screen and not on a bootleg DVD or screener, we give it the place in the sun we feel that it has been denied for too long. It may be a film from 1991, but this was the year that it saw the light of day here. I don't see why our voting for it is such an insult.

Archer on December 15, 2011, 05:57 PM

I'm currently weeping semen tears over the exclusion of "House of Pleasures". Otherwise, great list!

Jaime N. Christley on December 16, 2011, 07:42 AM

What Ed said—

I understand what acf171072 is trying to say but if you are serious about lists you have to allow that different criteria apply under different sets of circumstances: two sets, to be precise.

If you were to take the "year of US release" to its logical conclusion, you'd have to say THE RULES OF THE GAME is a 1950 film. Okay then, so don't take "year of US release" to it's logical conclusion. Okay. But if you were a critic back in 1950 and miraculously you had the internet back then and critics (largely freelance, unpaid, etc) were list-crazy and had the opportunity to stump for a movie that didn't get a proper release until that year, well then you hope people will join you in making some noise for THE RULES OF THE GAME.

I have a page that lists all my favorite films, from 2011 all the way back to the 1910s and beyond, and I use the IMDb year as the gold standard. What's really lovely is that, almost every day, the "official" year of at least one of those movies is altered by IMDb contributors who find evidence that such-and-such was actually released in 1959, or 1961, etc. If anyone wants to be the watchdog for that, be my guest. Why even now someone got it into their head that BLOOD OF A POET is a 1932 film, because that's when it had its Paris world premiere. To give you an idea of how *insane* this can get.

When awards/list season gets too heavy, you see writers standing back and saying things like "Well, all these lists are worthless, anyway, there's no objective value, etc." Well, ha ha, okay, sure. Except not quite—it's true that it isn't science, but (a) consider who made the list, not everyone's opinion is created equally, and (b) if the list circus is a form of play, it's play within a certain set of guidelines, not free-for-all, run-screaming-across-the-blacktop play. And hey, the rules let you stump for ARMY OF SHADOWS in 2006—sweet!

Finally, a US release isn't nothing. It makes a title the film critic version of news, so that it can be reported as an event. A paper like the New York Times will run a piece on it even if they have to send out a 14-year-old copy boy to catch a 2 AM showing in order to do so. While a few of us are very much aware that A BRIGHTER SUMMER DAY is a landmark film, US release or not, it's simply not possible to rally the US critical mass around any movie until it passes a certain threshold.

kylef on December 17, 2011, 04:18 PM

A lovely list! Only thing I would point out is that you list Sean Penn in TREE OF LIFE as Sean Pitt. Just a heads up on the slight slip.

Jack Pig on December 18, 2011, 12:56 PM

Though this is among the better lists I've seen, where's Fast Five? Even within its genre limitations, the quality and variety of sensations it manages to provide as well the superb execution of its narrative keep it well in the upper ranks of films released during the year. I fail to see how anyone who watches film for the kinds of experiences the medium can uniquely provide could consistently overlook it in favor of delusively-intellectual movies lacking the most rudimentary craftsmanship and ordering, as if a film's value derives not from what it is, but how facilely it serves as a platform for obscure blathering on thematics, anything but a broad aesthetic appreciation that implicitly considers formalistic and other concerns in its purview. Hence anything with perceived gravitas (be it via theme, mood, tone, pace or lack thereof) is automatically deemed good cinema, no matter how ineptly formed per film logic as opposed to through these desperately discursive goggles. I see so many people willing to pardon a filmmaker's utter failure to maintain a thoroughgoing authorial control over a film's structure, coherences, meanings, sensations, to the point of excusing harebrained philosophizing (much of The Tree of Life, which admittedly had incredible cinematography and the best scene of the year - Lacrimosa) and extreme dullness (say, the latter half of Melancholia) if the merest allusions and context exist amenable to initiate the common species of vapid "intellectual" discourse. I say this as someone whose favorite films are Tess, Pulp Fiction, The New World, Blue Velvet, Annie Hall, and Mulholland Dr.

snarpo on December 18, 2011, 02:28 PM

Wow. I can't remember a year of Slant's top 25 where I went "uh, huh?" more. Not that they're bad picks... I just have no idea what they are.

Parker on December 19, 2011, 02:07 AM

Incredible list. I'm really glad Poetry made the cut. My love for that movie surprised me. Certified Copy is a masterpiece. I can't wait to see Mysteries of Lisbon.

Justsaying on December 19, 2011, 08:25 AM

Re. Last sentence in the "Take Shelter" blurb — "...and the devastating scene where she and Shannon argue about whether or not they should open their cellar's storm doors is devastating." Double devastating, eh? No wonder the film made the list.

ogqozo on December 19, 2011, 06:27 PM

Kinda sad not to see "Hearbeats" and "Le Quattro Volte" mentioned, movies I loved. Especially Heartbeats, as House Next Door has hosted some enthusiastic writing about the movie around its premiere. Well, among the voters, looks like no one was that enthusiastic.

Glenn Heath Jr. on December 20, 2011, 12:04 PM

ogqozo: I listed HEARTBEATS in my HM's, and I believe one more writer did too. In any other year this would be in my Top 10.

ogqozo on December 21, 2011, 03:48 PM

Cool. I could watch the movie every day, it has such simple but refreshing way of showing. I can't wait till I get a chance to see "Mysteries of Lisbon", "In the Family" and "Margaret", so far they remain unreleased in my country. I hope they are released on American or English DVD.

mietzelfeld on December 28, 2011, 02:12 PM

no love for "weekend"? yikes.

rashomon on December 30, 2011, 03:34 PM

I'm really not sure why someone is bothered by a 1991 film making the list. Part of the job of every critic is to turn people onto films they would normally never have heard of. Often that includes older films. And so if an older film finally gets a release in the US twenty years after the fact then it IS eligible to make a list. A film like A Brighter Summer Day can actually make two lists. Best of 1991 and best of 2011. It depends on what criteria is used. I prefer release - and thus available to see - dates rather than 'first seen in the world' dates. Let me quote words of wisdom from Lauren Bacall, 'It's not an old movie if you haven't seen it."

glegs on December 31, 2011, 06:26 AM

I am surprised that "The Turin Horse" hasn't made it, I would have thought it would be a favorite. Is there a reason it isn't here?

rashomon on January 1, 2012, 05:26 PM

glegs

"The Turin Horse" doesn't get an official release until 2012. In the comment by Ed Gonzales he notes they only consider films that get a one week release in the US in a calendar year. Which is standard for most critic lists. I'm sure it will make the next year-end list.

deb on January 15, 2012, 10:13 AM

Excellent list! Two other films I would like to include are Mike Leigh's *another year* and Pablo Larrain's *post mortem*.

Add Your Own

Login to post comment

or Create an Account



Giveaway

Anatomy of a Murder
Newsletter