Review: Vanity Fair

Mira Nair’s stately costume drama does little to desecrate Thackeray’s opus.

Vanity Fair
Photo: Focus Features

William Makepeace Thackeray’s Vanity Fair, a sprawling critical appraisal of the corruption, hypocrisy, and injustices of early-19th-century English society, came adorned with the subtitle “A Novel Without Heroes.” True to form, the incisive novel concerned two women—shrewd, status-seeking Becky Sharp and and her demure, wealthy friend Amelia Sedley, who’s thrust into poverty—whose positive qualities were substantially balanced by their (and their contemporaries’) selfishness, stubbornness, wickedness, and idiocy. Yet director Mira Nair, assuming the weighty task of transposing an 800-page tome to the screen, has chosen to imbue Thackeray’s critique of social climbing with a women’s lib streak that mistakenly makes the conniving Becky (embodied with bundles of charm but too little cutthroat cunningness by Reese Witherspoon) a symbol of modern feminist pluckiness.

Although abridged, Thackeray’s basic story outline remains: Becky, intent on moving up in the world through the only means possible (marriage), flirts with high society and weds gambler Rawdon Crawley (James Purefoy), whose family is set to inherit a sizeable chuck of change upon their matriarchal aunt’s death. As Becky and her husband attempt to make a living in London, Amelia (Romola Garai) is financially ruined when her roguish husband, George Osborne (Jonathan Rhys-Meyers, once again too foppish for a role requiring caddish masculinity), dies in the Napoleonic Wars and her family is destroyed by debts owed to George’s callous father (James Broadbent). Nair, eschewing the prudishness of so many cinematic adaptations of Victorian classics, drenches the proceedings in sumptuously vibrant colors that both breathe life into the staid country manor milieu as well as comment on the sexual underpinnings of Becky’s calculated machinations. This Vanity Fair, from its glittering set design to its heroines’ heaving bosoms, is nothing if not enticingly opulent.

Regally shot by Declan Quinn and scored with grace (aside from the occasionally inexplicable sound of sitars) by Mychael Danna, Nair’s stately costume drama does little to desecrate Thackeray’s opus. However, the filmmakers seem aware that Witherspoon is a far more lively and transfixing presence than Garai, and as such we spend a disproportionate amount of time with Becky. The consequence of such narrative imbalance is that the film becomes an awkward—and slightly unfaithful—period piece about one pretty woman’s uplifting elevation from poverty to prominence. It’s likely, though, that many will find Nair’s insistence on shoehorning India-related stuff into the film whenever possible even more off-putting. True, England’s colonial exploits during the period do afford the opportunity to garnish certain scenes with a curried Eastern flavor. But despite my imperfect memory of Thackeray’s work, I still can’t seem to recall any ludicrously ill-fitting scenes involving Becky entertaining the dastardly Lord Steyne (Gabriel Byrne) with a sensual, hip-swiveling Indian dance number.

Advertisement
Score: 
 Cast: Reese Witherspoon, James Purefoy, Romola Garai, Jonathan Rhys-Meyers, Gabriel Byrne, Jim Broadbent, Bob Hoskins, Rhys Ifans  Director: Mira Nair  Screenwriter: Matthew Faulk, Julian Fellowes, Mark Skeet  Distributor: Focus Features  Running Time: 137 min  Rating: PG-13  Year: 2004  Buy: Video, Soundtrack, Book

Nick Schager

Nick Schager is the entertainment critic for The Daily Beast. His work has also appeared in Variety, Esquire, The Village Voice, and other publications.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.