The House


Ranting in Pictures

Ranting in Pictures

"Star Wars: The Phantom Menace was the most disappointing thing since my son."

That's the daffy opening line of filmmaker Mike Stoklasa's "Star Wars: The Phantom Menace Review," an insightful, rudely funny takedown of George Lucas' prequel. And it's as good a place as any to start an appreciation of a hybrid of the video essay and the mash-up—an emerging format that's often more entertaining than the work it cannibalizes.

Let's start by distinguishing straightforward mash-ups and video essays from works created by Stoklasa and his siblings-in-spirit. The term "mash-up" was first applied to musical works that combined existing pieces of recording music in order to create something new. The YouTube equivalent is defined by Wikipedia as a work that "combines "multiple sources of video—which often have no relation to each other—into a derivative work, often lampooning its component sources or another text." (Examples include those now-ubiquitous clips in which somebody puts, say, Joe Pesci's "Funny how?" monologue from Goodfellas into the mouth of Elmo, or turns Stanley Kubrick's The Shining into a heartwarming family comedy with music cues by Peter Gabriel and Thomas Newman.)

To read the rest of the article at IFC.com, click here.

  • print
  • email

TAGS: elmo, george lucas, goodfellas, ifc.com, mashups, mike stoklasa, stanley kubrick, star wars: the phantom menace, the shining






The HouseCategories





Site by  Docent Solutions