Lady in the Water

Lady in the Water ***

by Keith Uhlich on July 20, 2006   Jump to Comments (2) or Add Your Own


Among its many identities, M. Night Shyamalan's Lady in the Water is first and foremost a gaping psychic wound, a blood-spattered, pulsating tumor ripped violently from both its creator's head and, more fascinatingly, his heart, then planted on-screen, raw and unfettered, for all to come and see. That is its beauty and its limitation. Shyamalan's self-described bedtime story is as uncompromised a film as they come, yet it is cut from distressingly egocentric cloth, the product of a man with a frighteningly sincere messiah complex. Shyamalan isn't play-acting by casting himself in the film as a tortured writer who finds his muse in the mythical water creature Story (Bryce Dallas Howard). Like a populist Roland Barthes suddenly regressed to pre-adolescence, Shyamalan really believes in this hermetically sealed work's every childlike (often childish) syllable, sign, and signifier that points the way to his inevitable deification. But what of the scenes where his character is genuinely humble before the muse, genuflecting and attentive as if in the presence of a power greater than him, and augmented by Hong Kong-based cinematographer Christopher Doyle's own holy gaze (credit Shyamalan for picking true visionaries as his collaborators)? There is authentic contradiction here, more so than in the superficial shenanigans of Shyamalan's thinly veiled and ineffective political allegory The Village, and it is not a narrative afterthought.

The various types who populate the film's single setting—a seemingly nondescript Pennsylvania apartment complex called The Cove—are as much an emotional mess as their creator, the ostensible star of the multi-culti rogues gallery being Cleveland Heep (a superb Paul Giamatti), a stutter-afflicted building superintendent who harbors a tragic secret. He seems a weak-willed cripple, but when asked by a reclusive neighbor (Bill Irwin) if "mankind deserves to be saved," Cleveland responds without hesitation and in surprising earnest: "Yes." It is some kind of achievement that Cleveland's thought (the organic heart of the film) doesn't come off as pandering lip service, unlike the unfortunate B-plot involving the arrogant film critic Mr. Farber (a one-dimensional construct created solely for the auteur's lip-smacking revenge) to whom actor Bob Balaban nonetheless gamely adds several shades of gray. One wonders if the character's namesake, the great film critic Manny Farber, would have been as baffled as this writer by Shyamalan's film maudit, which inhabits some kind of nebulous space between those Farber-coined extremes: white-elephant art and termite art. For those brave souls willing to get lost in this Night-time labyrinth I can only guarantee you'll come out changed, though whether for the better or for the worse we'd best, as the muse might advise, leave that to history's reckoning.


  • Director(s): M. Night Shyamalan
  • Screenplay: M. Night Shyamalan
  • Cast: Paul Giamatti, Bryce Dallas Howard, Jeffrey Wright, Bob Balaban, Sarita Choudhury, Cindy Cheung, M. Night Shyamalan, Freddy Rodríguez, Bill Irwin, Mary Beth Hurt, Jared Harris, Tovah Feldshuh
  • Distributor: Warner Bros.
  • Runtime: 110 min.
  • Rating: PG-13
  • Year: 2006


Comments

kellyg25 on May 16, 2011, 12:43 AM

Come back Ed Wood. All is forgiven.

I am trying to find something positive to say about this movie...

1. M. Night Shymalan has easily managed to make a film actually worse and more ridiculous than Unwatchable (Unbreakable)

2. This movie is so bad that the reviews are more entertaining than the film itself

3. Only mad dogs and Englishmen go out in the midday sun. However neither of them would ever let Shyamalan direct a movie again.

4. I got free tickets to see this, so I only wasted my time, not money watching this.

5. Polio has been eradicated. Nothing to do with this film but far more interesting nonetheless.

6. (.. feel free to add to this list)

By a country mile, this film is the worst I have ever seen. At least Plan 9 from Outer Space has kitsch value. This garbage will never even achieve that. To call it an anti-climax would be an insult to both suffixes and climaxes. Appalling script. ridiculous characters, unfunny dialogue, self indulgent casting (director casts himself as a man whose book changes the world, but he will die for it). If only some of that last sentence were true! After seeing this and reading the above fans' positive review I am convinced that I have developed a Seventh Sense...."I see crap movies" Anyone with any remote sense of critical faculties will leave this feeling annoyed and probably ill.

Rob Humanick on May 24, 2011, 05:54 PM

Re: Anyone with any remote sense of critical faculties...

Then there are at least two other film writers here who haven't any, according to you.

Add Your Own

Login to post comment

or Create an Account



Giveaway

Hell on Wheels: The Complete First Season Blu-ray
Newsletter